Blog

  • Honest John Missile Launcher

    Honest John Missile Launcher

    As col­lec­tors, our beloved die cast toys stand out in our mem­o­ries for many rea­sons. The mem­o­ries could be of the unique func­tions a par­tic­u­lar toy had, the type of vehi­cle it was, where it was pur­chased, its col­ors, or even its size and name. For me, when it comes to the mem­o­ry of size and name of a toy, my fond­est is cer­tain­ly of the Dinky Hon­est John mis­sile launch­er.

    An original 1963 U.S. Army Honest John field manual and promotional water color print from Douglas Aircraft showing a pair of inbound Honest John missiles closing in on an armored column compliment the Dinky Honest John model superbly.

    Dinky released the 665 Hon­est John in 1964, and it was a good sell­er until it was dis­con­tin­ued in 1975. Mil­i­tary toys were ever present in the Dinky line­up from the start of the com­pa­ny in the 1930s all the way up to its demise in 1979. They would have con­tin­ued to be good sell­ers if Dinky had sur­vived into the 1980s, as many toy com­pa­nies still includ­ed mil­i­tary toys in their offer­ings at that point. The spring-loaded, fir­ing, rub­ber-tipped mis­sile gave Hon­est John immense play val­ue on the liv­ing room bat­tle­field floor, and since it was a truck-mount­ed mis­sile launch­er it was real­ly two toys in one! A child could still play with the truck after the mis­sile was launched or lost. My own Hon­est John truck sur­vived my child­hood rel­a­tive­ly unscathed — even though its mis­sile was fired into obliv­ion decades ago.

    Nicknamed “Dear John” by the troops who operated it, this example was the first type with the large distinctive launch rail and was known as the M289. This photograph was taken at Fort Hood Texas in 1955. Loaded with the missile, it weighed 47,660 pounds and rode on big 14.00 by 20 tires.

    The devel­op­ment of the real-life Hon­est John began in May 1950 at the Red­stone Arse­nal in Huntsville, Alaba­ma, at the behest of the Army Ordi­nance Corps.  The US Army want­ed a sim­ple, large cal­iber, spe­cial pur­pose field artillery rock­et that would car­ry a nuclear war­head, use sol­id fuel, and uti­lize as much off-the-shelf equip­ment as pos­si­ble in order to save mon­ey and devel­op­ment time.  In Octo­ber 1950, the San­ta Mon­i­ca, Cal­i­for­nia-based Dou­glas Air­craft Com­pa­ny was under con­tract for pre­lim­i­nary stud­ies, and lat­er became the pri­ma­ry man­u­fac­tur­ing con­tract. The rock­et was des­ig­nat­ed as Artillery Rock­et XM31, a high­ly-mobile sys­tem that would be launched from an Inter­na­tion­al Har­vester M139C six-ton truck chas­sis. (The M139C truck was pow­ered by a 224 horse­pow­er Con­ti­nen­tal six-cylin­der gaso­line engine with a four-speed man­u­al trans­mis­sion.)

    “This Big Stick stops trouble before it starts” was a fitting title for this colorful 1956 Douglas Aircraft ad for the Honest John.

    Red­stone Arse­nal Com­man­der, Brigadier Gen­er­al Hol­ger N. Toftoy, explained how Hon­est John came to have its unique moniker. He said: “Know­ing that troops usu­al­ly come up with their own nick­names for weapons if they didn’t like the offi­cial names, we cast about for a catchy easy to remem­ber name. Before the first test launch of the first 762mm rock­et there was con­sid­er­able con­tro­ver­sy in the Pen­ta­gon as if the sys­tem was worth­while. There was seri­ous con­sid­er­a­tion in the Gen­er­al Staff that such a large unguid­ed rock­et could not have the accu­ra­cy to jus­ti­fy fur­ther fund­ing. At this time, while on a trip to the White Sands Prov­ing ground in New Mex­i­co, we ran into a Tex­an mak­ing state­ments that were hard to believe. When his verac­i­ty was ques­tioned, he exclaimed, ‘Why, around these parts I’m called Hon­est John.’ Feel­ing some­what like a Tex­an at the time I felt Hon­est John would an appro­pri­ate nick­name.” [Source: U.S. Army Avi­a­tion and Mis­sile Life Cycle Man­age­ment Com­mand]

    The Dinky 665 Honest John was modelled on the later updated M386 version with the smaller launch rail. Note the stabilizing jacks emplaced on this truck. October, 1956. Photo courtesy of United States Army Sustainment Command Archives, Rock Island Arsenal.

    In Sep­tem­ber, Hon­est John received the new des­ig­na­tion of M31, and by the end of 1953 the first Army units took deliv­ery of the rock­ets. In ear­ly 1954, they were deployed to US Army units in Europe, where they would serve as a front-line weapon in the face of the then-con­stant threat of Sovi­et Russ­ian-backed War­saw Pact forces. Hon­est John bat­tal­ions con­sist­ed of two-to-three bat­ter­ies with two launch­ers. The rock­et was trans­port­ed in three pieces to the launch-area war­head — motor and fins in an M55 long wheel base car­go truck, with an XM 405 mis­sile-han­dling trail­er. It would then be assem­bled by the 12-man crew and hoist­ed onto the launch­er by an M62 wreck­er. It was aimed much like a can­non and launched in about five min­utes. For cold-weath­er oper­a­tions, elec­tric blan­kets made by Gen­er­al Elec­tric were used to warm the sol­id fuel before launch. 77 degrees was the opti­mal tem­per­a­ture for a com­plete burn of the sol­id rock­et fuel.

    The outgoing Dinky 667 missile servicing platform was the basis for the Honest John model as it had a very similar 6x6 chassis.

    The Hon­est John was the first nuclear capa­ble sur­face-to-sur­face rock­et in the Unit­ed States mil­i­tary arse­nal. The 27-foot-long, 762mm unguid­ed rock­et was pow­ered by an M6 sol­id-fuel rock­et engine, weighed 5,820 pounds, and was spin sta­bi­lized in flight by a pair of M7 spin motors. It car­ried a W‑7 nuclear war­head with a vari­able yield of up to 20 kilo­tons. It could also be fit­ted with a 1,500-pound, con­ven­tion­al, high-explo­sive war­head. It was fired from a hydraulic ele­vat­ed ramp fit­ted on the rear of the M139C truck with an M‑289 launch­er. The ini­tial M31 ver­sions had a range of about 15 miles. Almost 7800 M31 ver­sions were pro­duced between 1952 and 1960.

    Dinky advertised the arrival of the 665 Honest John just in time for Easter in the March 1964 issue of Meccano Magazine. What a gift for Easter, a toy tactical nuclear capable missile!

    Lat­er ver­sions would see the devel­op­ment of the more pow­er­ful M50 des­ig­na­tion that gave the mis­sile a short­er length, lighter weight, and small­er squared fins with a max­i­mum range of approx­i­mate­ly 30 miles with more accu­ra­cy. The M50 car­ried the W31 nuclear war­head that yield­ed 2, 10, or 30 kilo­tons.  Over 7000 M50 improved types were made up to 1965—when pro­duc­tion ceased.  The M289 launch­er was lat­er redesigned and des­ig­nat­ed M386; this is the ver­sion on which the Dinky is mod­eled. The redesign enabled a reduced size and less com­pli­cat­ed launch rail that incor­po­rat­ed a semi-rotat­ing launch­er base, also exhib­it­ed on the Dinky mod­el. These updates gave the truck a con­sid­er­ably small­er bat­tle­field pro­file. Also great­ly improved were the truck’s dri­ving char­ac­ter­is­tics, as the very long and heavy front over­hang of the launch rail was elim­i­nat­ed, along with the big blind spots on both sides of the cab.

    M386 versions are being assembled inside the cavernous halls of the U.S. Army Rock Island Arsenal in Rock Island Illinois in March, 1963. Photo courtesy of United States Army Sustainment Command Archives, Rock Island Arsenal.

    In the 1960s, a chem­i­cal war­head con­tain­ing 356 sarin nerve gas bomblets was added to the Hon­est John sys­tem. In 1962, both mod­els of the Hon­est John were giv­en new des­ig­na­tion num­bers. The M‑31 became the MGR-1A, and the M‑50 became the MGR1‑B. By 1965, M50 pro­duc­tion was completed—with over 7000 pro­duced. In 1972, the Hon­est John was grad­u­al­ly phased out from ser­vice by the then-new Lance mis­sile. In 1982, the Hon­est John was declared obso­lete and was retired by the US.

    Fresh off the production line, a completed M386 is blocked up and loaded on a rail car destined for Florida’s Eglin AFB in May,1961. Photo courtesy of United States Army Sustainment Command Archives, Rock Island Arsenal.

    Besides the US Army and Marines, oth­er oper­a­tors — nuclear and con­ven­tion­al — includ­ed Bel­gium, Cana­da, Den­mark, France, Ger­many, Greece, Italy, South Korea, Nor­way, Nether­lands, Tai­wan, Turkey, and the Unit­ed King­dom.  Greece, Turkey, and South Korea oper­at­ed their con­ven­tion­al war­head units into the 1990s. The Hon­est John had a longer ser­vice life than all oth­er U.S. bal­lis­tic mis­siles except the U.S.A.F. Min­ute­man ICBM, which is still in ser­vice.

    Taken in what was then West Germany, this U.S. Army M62 wrecker is towing the M405 missile handling trailer. The long bar fitted to the top of the missile is the M4E1 handling beam and it was used for loading. Too bad Dinky never modelled this great setup.

    Dur­ing the Cold War decades of the 1950s and 1960s, Hon­est Johns were a com­mon site in North Amer­i­ca, Asia, and West­ern Europe. Dinky cap­i­tal­ized on this, and it would have been hard to find a kid that wouldn’t be inter­est­ed in a toy that fea­tured a big mis­sile on a truck. When Dinky released the 665 Hon­est John mod­el in March of 1964, they were able to save on devel­op­ment funds for a com­plete­ly new mod­el. They mod­i­fied the already-avail­able Dinky 667 mis­sile-ser­vic­ing plat­form vehi­cle that was based on the real-life U.S. Army M280 five-ton short wheel­base chas­sis, which was sim­i­lar to the 6‑ton M139C chas­sis the Hon­est John uti­lized.

    This rare photo details the special tools and ancillary equipment that complemented the Honest John. Photo courtesy of United States Army Sustainment Command Archives, Rock Island Arsenal.

    The 667 was being dis­con­tin­ued after a four-year run so the rear super-sin­gle wheels were replaced by an eight-tire rear bogie, the two sta­bi­liz­ers removed, (though the mounts still remained) and an elon­gat­ed, detailed plas­tic rear was fit­ted to accom­mo­date the semi-rota­tion­al, func­tion­al, spring-loaded, launch rail and rock­et. It was an easy con­ver­sion for the Dinky design­ers. The white plas­tic mis­siles were launched by pulling a met­al han­dle back to put ten­sion on the spring, lock­ing it place, and then releas­ing to fire. The launch rail on the Dinky toy was very long in the rear com­pared to the actu­al Hon­est John due to the launch spring need­ing extra length while com­pressed.  How­ev­er, there are some stand­out cast­ing details on the launch rail that deserve men­tion­ing as the Dinky design­ers did a fan­tas­tic job here, and they could be eas­i­ly over­looked. There are four large braces present, two on each side, and these were the tie downs for the mis­sile when mount­ed on the rail. There are also four small steps, two on each side in the mid­dle of the rail. These small steps were the rest­ing points for the legs of the hoist on the M405 mis­sile han­dling trail­er. At the front of the rail, right below the riv­et cast­ings, you will find three small bars on both sides of the rail. These repli­cat­ed the hinge points that made the front sec­tion of the real launch rail that extend­ed over the truck’s cab split, and they fold to each side for trans­port. Sim­u­lat­ed hand cranks can also be found under close exam­i­na­tion.

    In service with the German Bundeswehr, this Honest John was taking part in a military parade in what was then the West German town of Oldenburg during May 1961. Note the front portion of the launch rail folded back for transport just above the drivers. Dinky cast the hinge detail for this feature on the model.

    The promi­nent fea­tures that the Dinky toy mod­el lacked com­pared to an actu­al Hon­est John would be the col­lapsi­ble cab roof, the three under-chas­sis sta­bi­liz­ers, dri­vers’ side spare tire mount, and a longer wheel­base.

    Up on a ladder, a U.S. Army soldier is manually jacking the missile backwards. Rear views of the Honest John like this are not often seen. October, 1957. Photo courtesy of United States Army Sustainment Command Archives, Rock Island Arsenal.

    Both the Dinky ver­sion of Hon­est John and the mis­siles often shown in pho­tographs were white. White and oth­er bright col­ors were used for track­ing and test­ing pur­pos­es, as was the black “checker­board” right below the large war­head of the rock­et. These were placed near the spin motors that sta­bi­lized the rock­et. Actu­al com­bat rock­ets were paint­ed olive drab green, but Dinky nev­er made an olive-green ver­sion.

    From my collection, four of the five box types for the Dinky Honest John are shown here. The plain end flap box is not present and the bubble box version is my model from childhood for which I recently found a box. The export window box on the top right is the rarest box type.

    Dinky man­u­fac­tured the mis­siles out of white plas­tic with a rub­ber war­head tip. Ear­ly pro­duc­tion mis­siles had the black checker­board fea­ture, but this was delet­ed as a cost-sav­ing mea­sure a few years lat­er. The mis­sile was a good rep­re­sen­ta­tion of the orig­i­nal, although the small shark fins in the mid­dle of the mis­sile were added by Dinky design­ers to fit into the launch rail to fire it via the spring when released. I have seen some late issues with a more real­is­tic appear­ing dark gray rock­et.

    Early Dinky Honest John models had water slide decals on the bumpers and silver detail on the headlights. To save costs, very late versions, like mine from childhood on the right, had stickers on the bumpers and no silver detail on the headlights.

    Dinky fin­ished the trucks in var­i­ous shades of dark green with green plas­tic wheels. The plas­tic rear launch­er base and wheels can be found in dif­fer­ent shades of green and black, with black being the rarest vari­ant. While these dif­fer­ent shades of green, and even black, for the wheels and body­work offer more ver­sions for the col­lec­tor to acquire, they do spoil the appear­ance of what is a very good rep­re­sen­ta­tion of the only die cast mod­el ever made of the Hon­est John, as the real-life ver­sions were all dark green, wheels and all.

    The Honest John name stood out to me since I was a child and so did its size compared to my other Dinky toys growing up. The scale of the Dinky Honest John was approximately 1/60 which was fairly common for early Dinky military vehicles. By 1975 when it was withdrawn, Dinky toys had grown considerably larger and for comparison, my childhood Honest John easily fits in the back of my childhood Dinky 668 1/42nd scale Foden army truck with the tilt removed.

    Wheel melt is a com­mon prob­lem affect­ing the lat­er issues. Ear­ly ver­sions seem to be immune from this, but I do see lat­er mod­els with this prob­lem. Dinky must have used dif­fer­ent plas­tic and rub­ber sup­pli­ers, as not all mod­els are affect­ed. Mine from child­hood has none, luck­i­ly. First run tires were a large all-ter­rain type, while final runs were a slight­ly small­er street type tire and “HEAVY DUTY” mold­ed into a smooth side­wall.

    I modelled this diorama on a typical Honest John exercise of the 1950’s and 1960’s era. While Dinky never made a U.S. Army M62 wrecker or the other support vehicles for the Honest John system, the French Dinky Berliet army wrecker used the same American Austin Western crane so it’s quite effective here loading a missile. I made a basic M4E1 handling beam out of a wooden coffee stirrer, some brass wire and black thread to support the missile during loading as on the real missiles. Balancing the missile for this photo was tricky but the end result was satisfactory. Gray tissue paper wrapped around one of the missiles simulates the electric warming blankets that kept the actual missiles’ solid fuel warm in colder temperatures.

    Unit mark­ings can be found on the front bumper and rear of the mod­els. Ear­ly issues were water slide decals while lat­er mod­els were paper stick­ers. Head­lights were ini­tial­ly paint­ed sil­ver, but lat­er this detail was delet­ed as a cost-sav­ing mea­sure.

    Ini­tial pro­duc­tion mod­els came in the very stur­dy, col­or­ful­ly-illus­trat­ed, lift-off lid box­es with an instruc­tion sheet with red print. Lat­er instruc­tion sheets had black or blue print. The first end-flap box to be released fea­tured a real­is­tic desert scene sim­i­lar to a set­ting at the White Sands, New Mex­i­co mis­sile range. This may be the most attrac­tive box. The US export win­dow box was also uti­lized, but due to the extreme­ly frag­ile nature of these box­es, they are very rare. The desert scene box was soon replaced by the end flap box that fea­tured a plain pic­ture with no back­ground. By 1973–74, the bub­ble box­es were uti­lized until the mod­el was dis­con­tin­ued in 1975. The bub­ble box­es, like all the oth­er Dinky toy box­es dur­ing this peri­od, had the instruc­tions print­ed on the base of the box—along with the annoy­ing “do not aim the mis­sile at peo­ple” cau­tion­ary print for those who lacked com­mon sense. I nev­er aimed any of my fir­ing mil­i­tary toys at any­one when I was a child.

    My Hon­est John was pur­chased for me by my mom around 1978 from Five Cor­ners Toy and Gift Shop in West­wood, NJ. This was my go-to retail­er for Dinky toys and it was often called The Dinky Store.  Despite the mod­el being with­drawn in 1975, they could still be found in stores where I lived.  As a life­long com­mer­cial and mil­i­tary vehi­cle enthu­si­ast, it was a toy I enjoyed very much. A few years lat­er, I would read about the real Hon­est John when I received from my dad Knowl­edge Through Col­or: Rock­ets and Mis­siles, by John W.R. Tay­lor, which I still own.

    Due to an 11-year pro­duc­tion run that over­lapped two decades, the mod­els cur­rent­ly are still abun­dant and afford­able for the col­lec­tor. They are always for sale on eBay and often at auc­tions, but many are miss­ing the mis­sile. The repro­duc­tion mis­siles are a wel­come addi­tion since, like mine, they were often lost and orig­i­nals were eas­i­ly bro­ken, espe­cial­ly the fins. The fins on the repro­duc­tion mis­sile are con­sid­er­ably thick­er.

    One has to won­der if any mod­els ever made it to Dou­glas Air­craft, the US Army, or Marines for dis­play and pro­mo­tion­al pur­pos­es. I have nev­er seen any evi­dence of it in my research but per­haps some­one can shed some light on this. Since it was the only diecast mod­el ever made of the Hon­est John, it would have made the per­fect pro­mo­tion­al piece and been quite at home dis­played on a general’s desk.

    While there have been some plas­tic mod­els offered of the Hon­est John over the past six­ty five plus years, Dinky deserves much cred­it for pro­duc­ing the only die cast mod­el toy ever made of the Hon­est John. Tekno, which always pro­duced superb die cast toy mod­els, offered a fan­ta­sy ver­sion of the Hon­est John that was based on their Sca­nia fire truck chas­sis, but it bears no resem­blance what­so­ev­er to the real Hon­est John.

    I men­tioned in the begin­ning of this arti­cle that in addi­tion to the name of the Hon­est John toy, the size also stood out to me. It always seemed odd­ly small to me! I nev­er knew why until years lat­er. Kids who, like me in the 1970s, col­lect­ed Dinky toys were accus­tomed to their large scale because that’s what Dinky made dur­ing the final era of pro­duc­tion. I didn’t have or know about small Dinky toys because they were all big by then.  Com­pared to the 1950s and 1960s mod­els, they were huge. When you place the Dinky Hon­est John next to a mod­el like my child­hood  1/42nd scale 668 Foden army truck, it can fit inside the car­go bed. Since it debuted in 1964, it was a good sell­ing car­ry­over from a small­er-scale decade that was long gone by the 1970s in the world of Dinky Toys. It was also the last Eng­lish Dinky mil­i­tary vehi­cle made in the small­er approx­i­mate­ly 1/60 scale. Nev­er­the­less, it was still one of my favorite mil­i­tary mod­els, and one can only imag­ine how grand a mod­el it would have been had it been pro­duced in the big­ger scales.

    This arti­cle was a very enjoy­able one to write: It’s about a Dinky Toy that’s not often dis­cussed or fea­tured, and I’ve always thor­ough­ly enjoyed the Cold War era that this mod­el was a big part of. 

    Regard­ing some of the pho­tos in this arti­cle, I want­ed unique views to fea­ture, dif­fer­ent from what can be found online.  I reached out to the U.S. Army at Rock Island Arse­nal in Illi­nois, as I knew that was where the Hon­est Johns were orig­i­nal­ly assem­bled. I was delight­ed to get a response from a very kind and knowl­edge­able gen­tle­man named Kaleb Bemis.  He sent me some rare and per­haps nev­er seen pho­tos, so I remain very grate­ful for his assis­tance.

    Writ­ing an arti­cle like this is nev­er a one-per­son endeav­or, so very spe­cial thanks go to Kaleb Bemis, Unit­ed States Army Sus­tain­ment Com­mand Archives, Rock Island Arse­nal; Mark A. Red­man; DTCA mem­bers Jan Wern­er, Jonathon Angel and Ravi Bhav­nani.

    Acknowledgements

  • Dinky Dealers in ’60s USA

    Dinky Dealers in ’60s USA

    I recent­ly pur­chased the A His­to­ry of Tri-ang and Lines Broth­ers Ltd, pub­lished in 2022 by Ken­neth Brown, who had ear­li­er writ­ten his his­to­ry of Mec­ca­no Ltd. (Fac­to­ry of Dreams). Although obvi­ous­ly periph­er­al to Dinky Toys, the book is inter­est­ing read­ing.

    As I have shared before, “Lines Broth­ers” was an epi­thet to me as a child, part­ly because I did­n’t like the “Visi-Pac” box­es, 1/42nd scale, and oth­er “inno­va­tions” they intro­duced to Dinky. Most­ly, though, it is because Dinky dis­tri­b­u­tion became so spot­ty in the U.S. from the time Lines acquired Mec­ca­no in 1964 until Tri-ang went bust in 1971.

    As quot­ed in the Tri-ang book, Graeme Lines wrote in a let­ter to a British Con­sul Gen­er­al in Decem­ber 1964 that Dinky faced “hair-rais­ing” mar­ket­ing dif­fi­cul­ties in the Unit­ed States. Else­where in the book, we read that Lines Broth­ers did not like to use wholesalers/distributors to sell its toys, pre­fer­ring to cut on the mid­dle­men. But in my own expe­ri­ence, to call Lines’ U.S. efforts “half-baked” would be rather char­i­ta­ble. Match­box (via U.S. dis­trib­u­tor Fred Bron­ner) and Cor­gi (via U.S. dis­trib­u­tor Reeves Inter­na­tion­al) were vast­ly eas­i­er to find in Amer­i­can stores dur­ing the 1960s.

    At the end of 1960, Meccano’s long­time U.S. dis­trib­u­tor, H. Hud­son Dob­son, closed down. As you can read in my arti­cle My Col­lect­ing His­to­ry and Ten Favorite Mod­els, five dif­fer­ent region­al dis­trib­u­tors were then appoint­ed for 1961, and lat­er increased to eight nation­wide. These region­al dis­trib­u­tors did a poor job, prob­a­bly because Dinky was only a minor side­line for most of them. Even­tu­al­ly, in 1963, Mec­ca­no Ltd. con­tract­ed with A. C. Gilbert to dis­trib­ute Dinky Toys in the U.S. But Gilbert wasn’t in good health, and that arrange­ment only last­ed a year.

    Mean­while, in the 1950s H. Hud­son Dob­son had reg­u­lar­ly adver­tised Dinky Toys in Boys Life (the offi­cial mag­a­zine of the U.S. Boy Scouts) and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions — in the lead-up to Christ­mas­time, even in gen­er­al mag­a­zines such as the Sat­ur­day Evening Post. Lines Broth­ers adver­tis­ing was much rar­er, but one ad did appear in Boys Life for Novem­ber 1965. It took up about 1 1/2 pages. The right-hand page had col­or draw­ings of some Dinky Toys, while the left-hand page had a black-and-white coupon and a list of stock­ists.

    The first copy of this ad I obtained list­ed only East Coast deal­ers. I rea­soned that Boys Life must, like most large-cir­cu­la­tion mag­a­zines of the time, have been pub­lished in both an East­ern edi­tion and a West­ern one. Even­tu­al­ly, I did obtain the lat­ter from eBay, though not with­out hav­ing ear­li­er pur­chased a copy that just hap­pened to be torn and defaced on the two rel­e­vant pages!

    I am shar­ing both copies of the list. Even so, this “par­tial” list still has omis­sions. (I don’t see Illi­nois any­where, for exam­ple.) In the Cal­i­for­nia list, I see some shops I don’t remem­ber, while oth­ers I recall hav­ing Dinky Toys are not list­ed. Maybe their stocks had come from H. Hud­son Dob­son or its inter­im suc­ces­sors and they were not doing busi­ness with Lines Broth­ers, or not yet by the time this ad appeared.

    If one can believe this list, the most reli­able source of Dinky Toys nation­al­ly was J. J. New­ber­ry, a chain of “vari­ety” stores sim­i­lar to Wool­worth’s. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, there were none near my home, so I can nei­ther con­firm nor deny it!

  • Dinky 275 Brinks Truck and its Unique History

    Dinky 275 Brinks Truck and its Unique History

    Dinky’s Brinks Truck (275) has been one of my favorite mod­els ever since it was released, both for its accu­ra­cy and its “play val­ue.” As I now know, it also has a unique his­to­ry among Dinky Toys.

    Name­ly, Dinky’s Brinks Truck:

    • was first issued in 1964, fol­lowed sev­er­al years lat­er by a sub­tly dif­fer­ent pro­mo ver­sion;
    • includ­ed acces­sories made by Mec­ca­no France;
    • got delet­ed in 1969, then tem­porar­i­ly res­ur­rect­ed as a lim­it­ed-pro­duc­tion Mex­i­can pro­mo in the mid ’70s;
    • rejoined the Dinky range in 1979, six­teen years after its debut. The last gasp ver­sion nev­er made it into any cat­a­log, and was paint­ed and assem­bled in Texas.

    All this was thanks to the Brink’s Com­pa­ny, known for its bul­let-resis­tant armored trucks for trans­port­ing mon­ey and oth­er valu­ables. Brink’s was found­ed in 1859 and boasts of being one of the old­est com­mer­cial brands in the world. In the U.S., “Brink’s Truck” is often used as a pro­pri­etary eponym for every armored truck, no mat­ter whose name is on them.

    Armored trucks make great toys because of their poten­tial for being “robbed.” But it seems that in 1964, no accu­rate diecast mod­el of one bear­ing the Brink’s name had ever been made. (There were some crude pre­de­ces­sors, such as a cast-iron Brink’s truck with a coin slot, and a plas­tic bat­tery-pow­ered Brink’s truck with a remote con­trol.)

    Brink’s, which had been acquired in 1959 by Pittston, a trans­porta­tion and min­ing con­glom­er­ate, appar­ent­ly decid­ed it was time for a detailed mod­el — one that, while still a toy, could be pre­sent­ed to bankers and oth­er clients with­out apolo­gies. It agreed to pay Mec­ca­no Ltd. for the tool­ing, also com­mit­ting to pur­chase a large quan­ti­ty of mod­els.

    Dis­claimer: No records of this deal exist, but giv­en the exten­sive use Brink’s would make of the result­ing Dinky, it seems irrefutable. Besides, the Brink’s name is cast into the toy’s base­plate, seal­ing the deal and ensur­ing that the mod­el could not be sold with some­one else’s liv­ery. The 275 Brinks Truck was announced in the Decem­ber 1964 issue of the Mec­ca­no Mag­a­zine by Chris Jel­ley, who wrote the fol­low­ing:

    Before space runs out on me, I must move on to the very last Dinky Toy due to appear in 1964 — the Brink’s Armoured Car (No. 275). Brink’s are a pri­vate secu­ri­ty com­pa­ny who do the same sort of job in Amer­i­ca that a firm such as Securi­cor do in Britain. One of their main duties is to trans­port mon­ey and gold for banks or to car­ry large pay­rolls for indus­tri­al con­cerns, etc. To do this they use strong armoured vans, and it is one of these, made by Gen­er­al Motors, that we have pro­duced in minia­ture.

    Fea­tures of the Dinky mod­el embrace open­ing cab and rear doors, inte­ri­or fit­tings, and win­dows. Inside the cab ... are a dri­ver and guard in semi­of­fi­cial uni­form. The vehi­cle is fin­ished in grey, dec­o­rat­ed with authen­tic trans­fers. The wind­screen and win­dows are tint­ed, and the mod­el comes com­plete with two open­ing chests, each con­tain­ing eight ‘gold’ ingots.

    A small pic­ture of the pro­to­type truck appeared in the Mec­ca­no Mag­a­zine arti­cle. An artist’s ren­di­tion of the Dinky, mean­while, was in an adver­tise­ment on the back cov­er.

    The Brinks prototype in the Meccano Magazine.

    The Dinky Brinks Truck advertised on the back cover of the Meccano Magazine, December 1964.

    Two things are notable in Jel­ley’s write­up. First, he obvi­ous­ly was not sure where to put the apos­tro­phe in Brink’s. Dinky would solve that conun­drum by drop­ping the apos­tro­phe entire­ly on the mod­el’s box­es and all sub­se­quent pub­lic­i­ty! (In this arti­cle, I have fol­lowed their lead, using the apos­tro­phe when refer­ring to the com­pa­ny and omit­ting it when refer­ring to the Dinky itself.)

    The sec­ond is his men­tion of Gen­er­al Motors (GMC). The 275 Brinks Truck is a detailed mod­el of a GMC vehi­cle, yet the GMC logo is not present and that com­pa­ny would nev­er again be men­tioned by Mec­ca­no.

    It’s pos­si­ble there were licens­ing dif­fi­cul­ties with GMC. Pre­vi­ous­ly in 1961, Mec­ca­no had mod­eled a GMC “Can­non­ball” trac­tor for its 948 Trac­tor-Trail­er McLean, known to have been financed by the truck­ing com­pa­ny. In that case too, the GMC label did not appear on the toy and was nowhere ref­er­enced.

    It’s also pos­si­ble that Brink’s sim­ply did­n’t want to share the spot­light with GMC. After all, it did­n’t use only GMC trucks for its armored cars; it also used trucks from Ford and Inter­na­tion­al, as shown below.

    Two period Brink’s trucks, GMC (left) and International (right).

    In any case, the pro­to­type for Dinky’s armored “car” (as Mec­ca­no first called it) was a 1962 or 1963 GMC medi­um-duty C‑Series, either a 2‑ton 3500 or a 2½-ton 4000 mod­el. It was equipped with a gaso­line-pow­ered V‑6 (304.7 cu. in., 5.0L) offer­ing 165 horse­pow­er, or, option­al­ly a 351.2 cu. in. (5.7L) ver­sion with 180 horse­pow­er.

    Every one of those hors­es would have been need­ed to drag the weighty vehi­cle around. Accord­ing to the web­site coachbuilt.com, Brink’s had been the first in the indus­try to rein­force its cars with armor and weapons. Brink’s vehi­cles could be equipped with .38 cal­iber revolvers, .44 cal­iber repeat­ing rifles, 12-gauge shot­guns, gas riot guns, and sub-machine guns.

    A GMC Brink’s truck in “The Kidnapping of the President” (1980).

    The GMCs were sent in the form of a naked chas­sis with only a front cowl to long­time Brink’s con­trac­tor J. Tom Moore and Sons of Mem­phis, Ten­nessee, where an armored body was fit­ted. Exact details of the armor were kept secret, but might have been revealed years after the fact in a 1980 movie, The Kid­nap­ping of the Pres­i­dent (star­ring Hal Hol­brook and William Shat­ner), where a 1962–66 GMC Brinks Truck not only stars but is blown up for art’s sake.

    In the movie, a sup­posed Brink’s offi­cial states that the truck­’s walls were of sand­wich con­struc­tion: a quar­ter inch of steel, an inch of cot­ton bat­ting to stop bul­lets, and then a sec­ond lay­er of steel. Mean­while, the truck­’s floor was said to be two inch­es of sol­id steel.

    Brink’s truck armor discussed with William Shatner in “The Kidnapping of the President “(1980).

    Brink’s Trucks used to shelter police during 1968 riots in Cleveland.

    Return­ing to the Dinky Toy itself, the mod­el was ini­tial­ly released in a Visi-Pac box, priced at 12 shillings 11 pence (65p) in Britain, $2.98 in Cana­da, and $3.98 in the U.S. After a year or two, Mec­ca­no switched to a more-durable pic­ture box, show­ing a Brink’s truck parked in front of a bank in an obvi­ous­ly Amer­i­can set­ting.

    The first Brinks Truck in a Visi-Pac box. 

    The first Brinks Truck in a picture box. 

    The Dinky is a very faith­ful repli­ca, except that both the GMC logo and a piece of trim that ran between the head­lights have been removed. The doors, which were one of the more inten­sive uses of plas­tic in a Dinky to date, are nice­ly mold­ed but tend to flop open.

    GMC trim deleted from the Dinky. 

    The Brinks Truck’s grille. 

    The “gold” crates sup­plied with the mod­el are espe­cial­ly inter­est­ing. Apart from their con­tents, they are iden­ti­cal to the 849 Caiss­es sold as an acces­so­ry by Mec­ca­no France since 1959. (One of these crates, con­tain­ing “radioac­tive mate­r­i­al,” would lat­er be used in the 105 Max­i­mum Secu­ri­ty Vehi­cle too.)

    The Brink’s Com­pa­ny like­ly made use of the stan­dard Dinky Toys, but with­in a few years it ordered a spe­cial run of pro­mo ver­sions. Still sup­plied with the two crates, the pro­mos are dif­fer­ent in that the plas­tic doors are now a dark­er grey, the chas­sis is a brighter blue, and the wheels are black.

    The promo version of the first Brinks Truck.

    A more sub­tle change took place beneath. The rep­re­sen­ta­tion of the exhaust pipe at the truck­’s left rear has for some rea­son been delet­ed. Also at the rear, two square box­es pos­si­bly rep­re­sent­ing chas­sis rein­force­ments have been added. Pre­sum­ably made at Brink’s behest, these tool­ing changes were of course per­ma­nent.

    The exhaust pipe (top right) was deleted on the second version (bottom) for an unknown reason.

    Brink’s gave its pro­mo ver­sions to employ­ees — I pur­chased my sam­ple on eBay from a retired Brinks guard — and prospec­tive clients. It appears that most came in the stan­dard pic­ture box.

    Tires and wheels on the first Brinks Truck (left) and the promo version (right).

    I have nev­er seen a def­i­nite date for this first pro­mo ver­sion, but it always sports the plas­tic tires labeled Heavy Duty that start­ed appear­ing on Dinkys around 1968, so it can­not be ear­li­er. Mean­while, the stan­dard ver­sion appeared in a cat­a­log for the last time in 1969. How­ev­er, that was far from the end of the mod­el!

    In approx­i­mate­ly 1976 (no def­i­nite date is doc­u­ment­ed), a lim­it­ed quan­ti­ty of Dinky trucks was ordered from Liv­er­pool by a Mex­i­can com­pa­ny, Ser­vi­cio Pan Amer­i­cano de Pro­tec­cion (SPP).  At the time, Brink’s owned a 21% stake in SPP; it acquired the rest of that com­pa­ny in 2010.

    Sup­plied in an unmarked white box, the Pan Amer­i­cano Dinky is fin­ished in a dark­er all-over grey with a black base, and no longer includes the crates or fig­ures of pre­vi­ous ver­sions. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, the plas­tic tires almost always have glued them­selves to the plas­tic wheels via a messy chem­i­cal reac­tion.

    The Pan Americano version.

    Inci­den­tal­ly some price guides refer to the Pan Amer­i­cano Dinky as the “Luis R. Pica­so Man­riquez” truck. This is a mis­con­cep­tion picked up from a pho­to that appeared in Mike and Sue Richard­son’s his­to­ry of Dinky Toys. In fact, Sr. Man­riquez was a Pan Amer­i­cano offi­cial who might have been respon­si­ble for order­ing the Dinky.  About 20 years ago, I was lucky enough to pur­chase two of the mod­els direct­ly from a for­mer assis­tant of his.

    These mod­els always sport the fly­ing horse logo of Pan Amer­i­cano, but a num­ber have turned up in UK auc­tions with­out the com­pa­ny name decals. I’m guess­ing these sam­ples “leaked” to col­lec­tors from Binns Road direct­ly, and that the oth­ers got dec­o­rat­ed with the fid­dly name decals in Mex­i­co.

    This photo in the Richardsons book led to naming confusion. It shows a sample of the Pan Americano truck without its company name decals.

    The end of the sto­ry came in 1979, when Brink’s had obvi­ous­ly run out of its stocks of the Dinky truck and want­ed more. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, Binns Road — soon to be closed — was in dis­ar­ray. They were hav­ing trou­ble meet­ing demand for the Dinkys that retail­ers had already ordered. There was lit­tle time for pro­duc­tion of a “zom­bie” mod­el that the Amer­i­cans want­ed. What to do?

    Accord­ing to both con­tem­po­rary accounts and rec­ol­lec­tions on web­sites devot­ed to plas­tic kits, Mec­ca­no own­er Air­fix had made a series of increas­ing invest­ments in AVA Inter­na­tion­al, its U.S. dis­trib­u­tor. Some time in 1979, AVA’s name was changed to USAir­fix. Since the main busi­ness of Air­fix was plas­tic kits, tool­ing was import­ed from Eng­land and sent to an injec­tion-mold­ing facil­i­ty in Dal­las. Import­ed kits were also placed into larg­er U.S.-specific box­es “for greater shelf appeal.”

    The Amer­i­cans were appar­ent­ly not set up for die cast­ing, so when the order came for a “repop” of the Brinks Truck, there was only one solu­tion. Cast the mod­el at Binns Road, then send the naked parts to Texas for paint­ing, assem­bly, and pack­ag­ing. (The same was also done with Dinky’s pock­et-size Star Trek mod­els, the 802 Klin­gon Cruis­er and 803 Enter­prise.)

    The fin­ish on the U.S. Brinks Truck has been crit­i­cized (it is even worse on the 802 and 803) but the mod­el did have one improve­ment com­pared to the Pan Amer­i­cano ver­sion: met­al wheels which no longer react with the tires. The fin­ish is now gray for the body and doors, blue for the chas­sis, and white for the roof. The roof col­or is not suf­fi­cient­ly dis­tinct from the body and stands out only in the most sym­pa­thet­ic light. Hard­ly worth the trou­ble.

    The U.S.-assembled Brinks Truck.

    The Brink’s labels are sim­i­lar to before, but unfor­tu­nate­ly they are now stick­ers rather than decals. Binns Road could not or would not alter the cast­ing, so the ribs on the sides of the truck that had helped line up decals now meant that the stick­ers don’t stay in place. With its injec­tion-mold­ing capa­bil­i­ties, USAir­fix did remove ribs from the plas­tic doors in order to accom­mo­date a larg­er Brink’s label, but these don’t adhere well either.

    Wheels on the Pan Americano truck (left) compared to those on the final U.S. version (right).

    For years, I thought U.S. assem­bly of the final 275 Brinks Truck had to be a myth, because the mod­el is so com­mon­ly found on U.K. auc­tion sites. But now I know that not only was it U.S.-finished, it was also (re)imported and sold in Britain. In those inno­cent days before bar codes, the unal­tered Amer­i­can pack­ag­ing was employed, com­plete with AVA and USAir­fix men­tions on the back.

    The U.S.-assembled Brinks Truck came in a hanging window box (left) that mentioned both AVA and USAirfix on the back (right).

    The ver­sions sup­plied to Brink’s were no dif­fer­ent from those sold in stores, but Brink’s print­ed its own box, fea­tur­ing a lift-off lid and a Brink’s logo. Par­tic­u­lar­ly favored cus­tomers also received a set of brand­ed cuf­flinks and a book called “The Mon­ey Movers” which had first been pub­lished in 1959.

    Brink’s gave out the final version in a white box with lift-off lid. 

    Hav­ing Brinks Truck cast­ings cross the Atlantic twice seems an inef­fi­cient way of doing busi­ness. But in that fraught year of 1979, Air­fix also exper­i­ment­ed by hav­ing the 180 Rover 3500 and 219 Big Cat Jaguar made in Hong Kong, and the 122 Vol­vo Estate and 361 Mis­sile Fir­ing War Char­i­ot made in Italy.

    Any­how, U.K. pur­chasers of the Brinks Truck helped defray ship­ping costs. When I queried sev­er­al Face­book groups devot­ed to Dinky Toys, two dif­fer­ent users recalled pay­ing £5 apiece for the trucks at their local toy shops. That was a high price for a Dinky at the time. The well-known toy store Ham­ley’s of Lon­don charged even more: £7.25!

    Hamley’s marked the final Brink Truck up to £7.25.

    Today, the final ver­sion of the Brinks Truck is easy to find from both U.S. and U.K. sell­ers for around $50. In 1983, one could have got­ten one for free by writ­ing Brink’s, which the first image below can attest to!

    Brink’s still had Dinky trucks in stock in 1983.

    All four Dinky Brinks Trucks.

    Only the first two Brinks Trucks had painted taillights.

    Acknowledgement

    Many sources con­tributed bits of infor­ma­tion to this arti­cle. They include 6066gmcguy.com, Coachbuilt.com, Row­land Hill, Peter Hinks, Partholan Joyce-Fen­lon, Qual­i­ty Diecast Toys (QDT), Nigel Robertshaw, Mark Simiele, Vec­tis Auc­tions, Andy Wake­ford, and Mark Wood­ford.

  • French Ford Trucks by Dinky Toys

    French Ford Trucks by Dinky Toys

    The French fac­to­ry for Dinky Toys made a nice French Ford truck, the 25 series, in twelve dif­fer­ent ver­sions from 1949 to 1955. Here are two pho­tos of eleven of them before I found the twelfth one.

    The very first ver­sion of the French Ford Cov­ered Wag­on truck was plain, with­out a liv­ery. Only made in 1949 – 1950, with all met­al (diecast) tires and wheels, and quick­ly super­seded by lat­er ver­sions with adver­tis­ing on the side. Very dif­fi­cult to find now. This truck was also called a Ford “Pois­sy” 5‑ton cov­ered truck. Pois­sy was the his­toric Ford France plant estab­lished in 1938.

    The plain ver­sion was quick­ly replaced by the Cal­ber­son and SNCF ver­sions in 1950.

    The oth­er ear­ly French com­mer­cial truck with adver­tis­ing, the Ford cov­ered van in Grands Moulins liv­ery, is shown below. From about 1953, this one is now rare and not easy to find near mint. Of the three 25 series Cov­ered Wag­on trucks, this Grands Moulins de Paris is my favorite. For those of you unfa­mil­iar with the 1950’s French Dinky Toys, look care­ful­ly at the tires, and see the ‘M’ embossed on them. For many years this was a hall­mark of the French made tires, not sure why they need­ed to include that, as their Eng­lish cousins nev­er did, but the French did sev­er­al Dinky things their own way.

    The pho­to on the left below is the Farmer’s Truck, made from late 1940’s until 1952. I real­ly like the light metal­lic blue that the French fac­to­ry used on many mod­els in the 1950’s. On the right is the End Tip­per.

    The French Dinky Toys 25H Ford Bev­er­age Truck was only made for a few years in the ear­ly 1950’s, and is an inter­est­ing mod­el. It’s basi­cal­ly a flat truck with a tail­board, but instead of mak­ing it diecast, it was sim­ply made of tin­plate and tabbed into slots at the rear of the truck. It worked and cer­tain­ly looks great, but in real­i­ty, the tin­plate is not very strong, and eas­i­ly bent, so many of these have lost the tail­board over the years.

    Also of inter­est are the diecast tire/wheels. Dur­ing the Indochi­na War from 1946–54 (in Cam­bo­dia, Laos and Viet­nam), Indochi­na was the main sup­ply of rub­ber for France; thus, the war dras­ti­cal­ly reduced the sup­ply of rub­ber to France, hence the Dinky Toys sol­id diecast wheels. (Jacques Dujardin). So Mec­ca­no solved it by using a diecast tire/wheel and paint­ing it black.

    This next one is a Ford Open Truck, made around 1949. Anoth­er French Dinky of that era with sol­id met­al wheels.

    A pur­chase a while ago sat­is­fied a long quest to find a mint and boxed French Dinky Toys 25O Ford “Nes­tle” milk truck. These were made at var­i­ous times from around 1950 through 1955, and have two very nice fea­tures: one are the 10 sep­a­rate milk cans, car­ried in the rear load­ing area; and the oth­er is the unique box it was sup­plied in: designed to prop­er­ly house those loose 10 milk cans.

    The French Dinky Toys fac­to­ry made two dis­tinct ver­sions of the Nes­tle milk truck: the first was on the ear­li­er Stude­bak­er chas­sis, up to around 1954, then adapt­ed to the French Ford Pois­sy chas­sis for anoth­er cou­ple of years. Many of these are miss­ing some or all of the milk cans, but re-made replace­ments are avail­able. As a young boy, I always liked these.

    Here are both ver­sions of the 25O “Nes­tle” Milk Truck: the Ford is on the left and the Stude­bak­er on the right. Both were made between 1950 and 1955, and shared the same mod­el num­ber. Notice the dif­fer­ent tam­po Nes­tle let­ter­ing.

    Dinky Toys made lots of trucks with Esso adver­tis­ing; here are three. From left, the Pan­hard Esso Tanker, the French Ford Small Esso Tanker and the Tro­jan Esso Van. All are from the ear­ly to mid 1950’s.

    The 25R French Ford Tow Truck was cre­at­ed out of slight­ly mod­i­fy­ing the the rear car­go area of the open wag­on truck. Since they need­ed to add the let­ter­ing on the rear, via tam­po appli­ca­tion, they had to have a smooth sur­face, and the reg­u­lar wag­on had sim­u­lat­ed slats on the rear. So the die was mod­i­fied to allow it to be smooth. And by the way, this is one of the few Dinky Toys offered for sale, but nev­er list­ed in a cat­a­log. It was only made for 1955, and was soon replaced by the larg­er Cit­roen Tow Truck. And this Ford, in turn, replaced the ear­li­er Stude­bak­er tow truck.

    What prob­a­bly hap­pened was that the tools for the Stude­bak­er failed or wore out while the Cit­roën was been devel­oped. There­fore, the Ford filled a ten-month gap until the Cit­roën could be issued. The Ford appeared only in the Mec­ca­no cat­a­logue of 1954. (Jacques Dujardin) Both the Ford and Stude­bak­er (long nose) are shown below.

    The French Ford Refuse Truck, or Trash Truck, is such a jew­el that I cov­ered it in a sep­a­rate arti­cle Dinky Toys French Ford Trash Truck.

    Very ear­ly, first type front end of the icon­ic and very well loved 25 series Ford trucks, dat­ing to 1949, is on the left, then com­pared to the lat­er cast­ing from the mid-1950’s, on the right. If you look care­ful­ly, you can see the many changes that occurred.

    The 1951 French cat­a­log has a nice illus­tra­tion on the front cov­er; sev­er­al Ford trucks can be seen there.

    This 25 series of French Dinky Fords is so charm­ing that I am glad that I have this oppor­tu­ni­ty to share them with you. Here are two views of all twelve togeth­er in one place!

  • Land Rover 27D & 340: A Dinky Toys Icon

    Land Rover 27D & 340: A Dinky Toys Icon

    The leg­endary Dinky Toys Land Rover made its debut in the April 1950 issue of Mec­ca­no Mag­a­zine.

    It was orig­i­nal­ly part of the 27 Series, ded­i­cat­ed to agri­cul­tur­al mod­els, and car­ried the mod­el num­ber 27D. In 1954, it was renum­bered to 340, a ref­er­ence it kept until the end of its pro­duc­tion in 1971. With a remark­able 21 year run, the Land Rover was one of the longest last­ing mod­els in the Dinky Toys line­up.

    The Boxes: From Retail Packs to Collectable Treasures

    When the Land Rover was first released in 1950, it was pack­aged in sim­ple yel­low or plain trade box­es. Each box held four vehi­cles and was marked with the 27D ref­er­ence num­ber.

    Image: Vectis Auctions

    Image: Vectis Auctions

    In 1954, when Dinky Toys intro­duced a new num­ber­ing sys­tem, these trade box­es began show­ing both 27D and 340 num­bers dur­ing the tran­si­tion­al phase.

    Image: Lacy Scott & Knight Auctioneers

    But then came a game-chang­er: Dinky real­ized that indi­vid­ual pack­ag­ing would appeal more to buy­ers — and sales soared. The now icon­ic yel­low indi­vid­ual box­es were intro­duced, each fea­tur­ing a charm­ing illus­tra­tion of the Land Rover on the box. A col­ored dot on the top of the lid of the box iden­ti­fied the col­or of the car inside, a small but clever detail.

    Image: Vectis Auctions

    Dur­ing the tran­si­tion from 27D to 340, both num­bers were print­ed on the indi­vid­ual box­es (around 1954). How­ev­er, once the orig­i­nal 27D stock was phased out, Dinky shift­ed to using just the 340 ref­er­ence on the pack­ag­ing — like­ly around 1955.

    At the end of the model’s pro­duc­tion, only the red/orange Land Rover was made and the dot was on the box but uncol­ored. Even­tu­al­ly the dot was removed.

    Images: Vectis Auctions

    Ministry of Agriculture promotional version

    A pro­mo­tion­al ver­sion of the Land Rover made in very small num­bers for the Min­istry of Agri­cul­ture and giv­en to sales reps who vis­it­ed farms and pro­mot­ed the real vehi­cle. You can read more about the MOA pro­mo­tion­al ver­sion in Vin­cent Espinasse’s arti­cle Land Rover Dinky Toys pro­mo­tion­nelle.

    Image: Phil Silvester (Diecast Gems)

    The mod­el was fin­ished in dark gloss olive green with a stan­dard deep beige inte­ri­or and had an ear­ly brown met­al dri­ver. It was enhanced at the fac­to­ry with sil­ver high­lights to the front and rear bumpers and also to the wind­screen, top edges, bon­net hinges and door han­dles and hinges. The mod­el had match­ing ridged wheels, grey ST tires and spare, and an unpaint­ed rear tow hook.

  • Catalog 1940 Canada

    Catalog 1940 Canada

  • Catalog 1947 USA

    Catalog 1947 USA

  • Catalog 1949 France

    Catalog 1949 France