Blog

  • Dinky Toys 153A US Army Jeep

    Dinky Toys 153A US Army Jeep

    After the war, Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool resumed pro­duc­tion and announced the first new mod­els as quick­ly as pos­si­ble. The first new mod­el select­ed was Dinky Toys Jeep No. 153A. It’s not sur­pris­ing, real­ly, that this par­tic­u­lar mod­el was cho­sen by Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool imme­di­ate­ly after the war. It’s a repro­duc­tion of the famous Amer­i­can Army Jeep that played a sig­nif­i­cant role in WWII. The U.S. Army Jeep is con­struct­ed to con­form to the USA War Depart­ment tech­ni­cal man­u­al TM 9–803 1/4‑Ton 4 x 4 Truck (Willys-Over­land mod­el MB and Ford mod­el GPW), sim­ply called “Jeep”. I’ll show you some pho­tos of it in this arti­cle. Dur­ing the war, this Jeep was trans­port­ed dis­as­sem­bled in crates by ship from Amer­i­ca to Eng­land, where it was reassem­bled in var­i­ous assem­bly depots. From there, it was lat­er shipped to the coast of Nor­mandy for the D‑Day inva­sion. Eng­land thus played a sig­nif­i­cant role in assem­bling and prepar­ing this Jeep for use. I feel it’s impor­tant to men­tion this and there­fore want to first focus on the pro­to­type of the Jeep itself.

    Willys Jeep MB on a conveyor belt, dismantled in crates for transport overseas.

    The Jeep Willys-Overland was shipped overseas in crates from Toledo, Ohio.

    Instructions for unpacking and assembly of a boxed Willys Jeep.

    Assembly depot No. 0–640 in Tidworth, Wiltshire, England, 8 Sep 1943.
    Image: Facebook.


    The Prototype of the 153A Jeep

    The Jeep is a well-known vehi­cle, made famous by the Unit­ed States dur­ing WWII as the U.S. Army Jeep, with its white U.S. Army star on the hood, which was used exten­sive­ly by the Unit­ed States and the Allied Forces. This four-wheel-dri­ve all-ter­rain vehi­cle acquired icon­ic sta­tus due to its ver­sa­til­i­ty dur­ing the war and played a sig­nif­i­cant role in its vic­to­ry. Gen­er­al Dwight D. Eisen­how­er wrote that the jeep was “one of the six most vital” U.S. vehi­cles to win the war. This Jeep can still be seen today par­tic­i­pat­ing in lib­er­a­tion parades. Well over 600,000 were built to a sin­gle stan­dard­ized design for the Unit­ed States and the Allied forces in World War II from 1941 to 1945.

    There is a long his­to­ry behind the devel­op­ment of the Jeep before it was final­ly put into pro­duc­tion. The Jeep had to meet a num­ber of strict require­ments for the U.S. gov­ern­ment to be eli­gi­ble for mil­i­tary pro­duc­tion dur­ing World War II. These require­ments encom­passed a com­bi­na­tion of tech­ni­cal spec­i­fi­ca­tions, per­for­mance, reli­a­bil­i­ty, and pro­duc­tion capac­i­ty. The vehi­cle had to have four-wheel dri­ve and be light­weight and com­pact. A com­pe­ti­tion devel­oped among man­u­fac­tur­ers to meet the U.S. gov­ern­men­t’s require­ments.

    Ban­tam, Ford, and Willys-Over­land built pro­to­types that were ful­ly test­ed. The Jeep his­to­ry Amsoil blog states “The final Jeep design was a mashup of the best from each pro­pos­al: The Ban­tam Spicer-sourced four-wheel trans­mis­sion and dif­fer­en­tial was mat­ed with the Willys Go-Dev­il engine and fit­ted with the body­work con­fig­u­ra­tion of the Ford Mod­el GP.

    Only Willys-Over­land met all the require­ments and was the only man­u­fac­tur­er to receive a gov­ern­ment per­mit to pro­duce this ¼‑ton 4x4 truck, the Willys-Over­land mod­el MB, start­ing on 23 July 1941. Because Willys-Over­land could not pro­duce suf­fi­cient quan­ti­ties, Ford received a per­mit to pro­duce the truck under license for Willys-Over­land as the Ford mod­el GPW (W = Willys-Over­land) start­ing in Octo­ber 1941. Dur­ing World War II, approx­i­mate­ly 363,000 Willys MBs and 280,000 Ford GPWs were pro­duced. This 4 x 4 truck was stan­dard­ized, mean­ing that all com­po­nents of the truck were inter­change­able. The parts from the Willys-Over­land MB fit seam­less­ly on the Ford GPW and vice ver­sa, which was impor­tant for repairs.

    The pro­to­type of the Dinky 153A is the Willys-Over­land mod­el MB, which is also sim­i­lar to the Ford mod­el GPW. Both Willys and Ford are men­tioned as the man­u­fac­tur­er in tech­ni­cal doc­u­ment TM 9–803, with descrip­tions and illus­tra­tions, as shown below. The doc­u­ment refers to the vehi­cle as the ¼‑ton 4 x 4 truck (Willys-Over­land mod­el MB and Ford mod­el GPW). The gener­ic name “Jeep” had yet to emerge and like­ly arose from the des­ig­na­tion of the Ford mod­el GPW, where GP(W) was pro­nounced as “Jeep”. Note the han­dles on the side of the Jeep, indi­cat­ed by red arrows. When a Jeep was deliv­ered and unpacked in a crate, four han­dles were first mount­ed to the chas­sis to facil­i­tate lift­ing.

    War Department Technical Manual for the Willys-Overland model MB and Ford model GPW – February 1944.

    Jeep left front view. The red arrows indicate the handles used to lift the body.

    U.S. Army Willys MB at the Virginia War Museum, Newport News, VA.
    Image: Wikipedia.

    Right rear, right and right front views of the Jeep.

    Covered Willy’s Jeep (2007). Image: Wikipedia.

    Jeep chassis plates.

    The Willys and Ford Jeeps have their own name­plates on the dash­board, along with the Cau­tion and Shift plates. The Cau­tion and Shift plates are the same for both mod­els. Only the name­plate reveals whether the vehi­cle is a Willys or a Ford. Experts can also tell the dif­fer­ence between the mod­els by the grille of the ear­ly Jeeps.

    Dashboard of a Willys Jeep showing the name, caution and shift plates.

    Use of the Willys Jeep by Leaders in WW II

    Dur­ing World War II, the Willys Jeep became an indis­pens­able tool for U.S. Army lead­ers oper­at­ing across Europe, prized for its rugged ver­sa­til­i­ty and reli­a­bil­i­ty in chal­leng­ing con­di­tions. Senior offi­cers used these com­pact 4x4 vehi­cles to trav­el quick­ly between com­mand posts, inspect front-line posi­tions, and coor­di­nate oper­a­tions over dif­fi­cult ter­rain where larg­er vehi­cles could not pass. In war-torn regions of France, Bel­gium, and Ger­many, the Jeep’s abil­i­ty to nav­i­gate mud­dy fields, bomb-dam­aged roads, and nar­row vil­lage streets made it an ide­al choice for mil­i­tary lead­er­ship on the move. More than just trans­port, the Jeep sym­bol­ized mobil­i­ty, adapt­abil­i­ty, and the U.S. Army’s abil­i­ty to project lead­er­ship any­where it was need­ed.

    President Franklin D. Roosevelt reviewing troops from a Jeep at Casablanca, 1943. Image: Wikimedia.

    In the summer of 1944, General Dwight D. Eisenhower wrote the Jeep was “one of the six most vital” U.S. vehicles to win the war. Image: Wikipedia.

    General George Patton riding in a Jeep near La Haye-du-Puits, Normandy, July 1944. Image: World War Pictures.

    Prime Minister Winston Churchill and General Bernard Montgomery visit the beaches of Normandy, 12 June 1944. Image: Wikimedia.


    Dinky Toys 153A Jeep

    Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool announced the arrival of the Dinky 153A Jeep along with the Dinky 28C Lagon­da Sports Coupe in the April 1946 issue of Mec­ca­no Mag­a­zine with the state­ment, “Now ready! Here are the first of the new Dinky Toys for which you have wait­ed so long. Oth­ers are com­ing soon. Watch our announce­ments.” The 38C Lagon­da had already been designed before the war and announced in the June 1939 issue of Mec­ca­no Mag­a­zine, but had­n’t yet been pro­duced, so it was­n’t entire­ly new after the war. The descrip­tion of the 153A Jeep read “A won­der­ful­ly real­is­tic minia­ture of the most famous car of the war. On all fronts, in all coun­tries, the Jeep was ready to go any­where and do any­thing.” The mod­els were appar­ent­ly not yet avail­able for sale, because the announce­ment “Now ready!” was repeat­ed month­ly until Sep­tem­ber 1946 when 153A Jeep, 38C Lagon­da Sports Coupe and 70A Avro “York” Air Lin­er were announced in Mec­ca­no Mag­a­zine as “Now avail­able!”  This was the start of the new post-war Dinky Toys series, made by Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool.

    Advertisements for the Dinky 153A Jeep in the April 1946 (“Now ready!”) and September 1946 (“Now available!”) issues of Meccano Magazine.

    Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool used the well known name “Jeep” for mod­el 153A with­out a brand or mod­el des­ig­na­tion. I described the Willys MB as the pro­to­type of the 153A Jeep as depict­ed in the U.S. War Depart­ment Tech­ni­cal Man­u­al TM 9–803, because only Willys-Over­land got per­mis­sion to pro­duce the U.S. Army Jeep, while Ford received a per­mit to pro­duce the truck under license for Willys-Over­land as the Ford mod­el GPW (W = Willys-Over­land). How­ev­er, both mod­els are iden­ti­cal. This makes it in fact impos­si­ble for Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool to select a spe­cif­ic brand name for the Dinky Toys mod­el name because the Jeep was man­u­fac­tured by both com­pa­nies. Accord­ing to Mike and Sue Richard­son’s Great Book of Dinky Toys, mod­el 153a was pro­duced from 1946 to 1955, but from 1950 onwards only as a U.S. export mod­el. So the pro­duc­tion run of the 153A for the U.K. was very short. The last men­tion of 153A in the U.K. cat­a­logs I found was in the Mec­ca­no UK price list from Sep­tem­ber 1948. The 153A did­n’t appear in U.K. cat­a­logs from 1950 onwards.


    Dinky 672 U.S. Army Jeep export model

    In 1950, Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool changed the name of the 153A to U.S. Army Jeep which was exclu­sive­ly intend­ed for export to U.S.A. and Cana­da. This was fol­lowed by a sim­i­lar change of name in cat­a­logs and trade box­es which bet­ter describes the real iden­ti­ty of the vehi­cle. In 1954, mod­el 153A was renum­bered to 672, but as men­tioned, it was only intend­ed for export to U.S.A. and Cana­da. Exports were cru­cial to the sur­vival of large com­pa­nies after the col­lapse of the econ­o­my caused by World War II. “Export or die!” was the gov­ern­men­t’s mot­to. Accord­ing to Kei­th Harvie, from 1952–55 a new body cast­ing was released as the export 153A and 672, with mod­i­fied front inner hood strength­en­ing points and flush cast­ing gates, a raised hood, and a paint ring. Because the Dinky 672 is an export mod­el and the last issue, they are hard to find.

    Dinky Toys USA 1951 catalog showing the 25J Civilian Jeep (left) and the 153A U.S. Army Jeep with the U.S. Army star (right).

    The 153A U.S. Army Jeep renumbered to 672 in the Dinky Toys USA 1954 catalog.

    The Jeep mod­el 153A was also released in civil­ian ver­sions as mod­el num­ber 25J with the same cast­ing as the 153A. How­ev­er in this arti­cle, I will lim­it myself to the orig­i­nal mil­i­tary ver­sion 153a/672. Many mil­i­tary vehi­cles end­ed up in the army dump after the war. Due to a short­age of vehi­cles after the war, the remain­ing Jeeps were used for all sorts of civil­ian pur­pos­es. Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool con­tin­ued to pro­duce the 25Y/405 Uni­ver­sal Jeep with the spare wheel mount­ed on the right in var­i­ous civil­ian ver­sions. Willys-Over­land also con­tin­ued to pro­duce civil­ian Jeeps after the war.

    My Dinky Toys Jeep collection on Keith Harvie’s 1999 “The Binns Road Gazette” magazine, issues 1 to 6.

    In a 1999 arti­cle in the first issue of the unfor­tu­nate­ly short-lived mag­a­zine Binns Road Gazette, U.S. pub­lish­er and edi­tor Kei­th Harvie described all the ver­sions of the Dinky Toys Jeep and pre­sent­ed them in black and white pho­tographs that includ­ed fac­to­ry draw­ings. His descrip­tion includes the fol­low­ing six ver­sions:

    1. 1946: First cast­ing with flat hood and sol­id steer­ing wheel, no paint­ing ring and smooth hubs.
    2. 1947: As above but with open steer­ing wheel and ridged wheel hubs.
    3. 1947 — 1948: Raised hood cen­ter, flush ejec­tor marks.
    4. 1948: As above but with raised ejec­tor marks. (The ejec­tors were too short or worn.)
    5. 1948 — 1952: As above but with cir­cu­lar paint­ing ring.
    6. 1952 — 1955: Final U.S. only export issue. As 153A-672 above but with strength­en­ing under the hood, flush ejec­tor marks, crimped or domed axles, blued or reg­u­lar axles, point­ed raised hood in cen­ter line, and paint ring.

    All issues were sold to deal­ers in trade box­es of six and did­n’t receive an indi­vid­ual box.

    Front and rear view of the first issue Dinky 153A trade box of six (1946). Note the closed solid steering wheels. Image: Vectis Auctions.

    The first issue 153A (1946) with closed solid steering wheel and smooth hubs, and U.S. Army star on the left rear only.

    Front view of the first issue 153A showing the flat hood, grill and sunken headlights.

    Top view of the first issue 153A showing the encircled U.S. Army Star on the hood.

    Base of the first issue 153A without the painting ring in center. Note the rare metal rings around the axles between the hubs and axle support. Axles of the Jeep usually lacked these metal rings.

    My four first issue Jeeps, all with smooth hubs but different tires, and three solid and one open steering wheel.

    The final issue Dinky 672/153A U.S. Army Jeep in a U.S. export issue trade box (1952–55). Image: J K Diecast Models.

    Dinky 153A/672 U.S. Army Jeep 1952–1955 final issue U.S. export model with strengthened inner hood area, painted insignia, convex raised hood and crimped axle ends.

    Left side of the Dinky 153A/672 U.S. Army Jeep export issue. Note the fine cast details of the shovel, handles, windshield, hood latch, top bow front and rear brackets for a canopy, with canvas and side reflector.

    Front view of the Dinky 153A/672 U.S. Army Jeep export model showing the grill, sunken headlamps and hood with raised center.

    Rear details of the Dinky 153A/672 U.S. Army Jeep export model showing the spare wheel, jerry can, bumpers and reflectors.

    Underside of the Dinky 153A/672 U.S. Army Jeep export model showing the reinforced inner hood area and painted central ring.
    L: Blue crimped axle ends. R: Last issue with regular domed axle ends.

    Dinky 153A with raised ejector marks.
    L: 4th version without painted ring. R: 5th version with painted ring.

    Dinky 153A Jeep base with flat ejector marks (L) and raised ejector marks ®.

    Evolution of the base of the Dinky 153A, with the oldest to newest shown R to L.

    Side view of the evolution of the hood of the Dinky 153A/672, going from flat (earliest version) to raised (latest version) shown R to L.

    Front view of the evolution of the hood of the Dinky 153A/672, going from flat (earliest version) to raised (latest version) shown R to L.

    L: Dinky 153A first issue with flat hood and crimped axles.
    R: Dinky 672 last export issue with raised hood and domed axles.

    Dinky 672 U.S. Army Jeep final U.S. export issue (1952–55) with raised hood and domed axles (L) and crimped axles ®.

  • Dinky Toys 965 Euclid Rear Dump Truck

    Dinky Toys 965 Euclid Rear Dump Truck

    Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool pro­duced sev­er­al mod­els with a tip­ping func­tion. These were oper­at­ed man­u­al­ly, such as the Muir-Hill Dump Truck, or with a turn­ing mech­a­nism, such as the Bed­ford End Tip­per. In 1955, Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool pro­duced the 965 Euclid Rear Dump Truck as a Dinky Super­toys mod­el that fea­tured a new supe­ri­or tip­ping mech­a­nism and they were very pop­u­lar. The 965 was pro­duced from 1955 to 1970, ini­tial­ly as the Euclid and from ear­ly 1969 as the Terex Rear Dump Truck. It was intro­duced in the Octo­ber 1955 issue of Mec­ca­no Mag­a­zine with a col­or adver­tise­ment on the back cov­er, a prac­tice that had become com­mon since March 1955. “The Toy­man” pre­sent­ed a com­pre­hen­sive two page descrip­tion with two black and white illus­tra­tions. From March 1953, “The Toy­man” fre­quent­ly described new Dinky Toys mod­els in Mec­ca­no Mag­a­zine.

    The Dinky 965 was introduced in the October 1955 issue of Meccano Magazine.

    The 965 Euclid Rear Dump Truck shown with the 962 Muir-Hill Dumper Truck. In the 1956 UK Dinky catalog, the color of the logo on the 965 changed to red.

    The Dinky 965 is a robust and solid­ly con­struct­ed Super­toys mod­el that has been con­tin­u­ous­ly improved over the years. The tip­ping mech­a­nism is bet­ter than pre­vi­ous mod­els and the the 965 is equipped with a well func­tion­ing pin­ion and ratch­et, allow­ing the tip­per to be grad­u­al­ly raised and low­ered for tip­ping.

    The first (1955) version of the Dinky 965 Euclid Rear Dump Truck compared with the first (1949/1950) version of the French Dinky 25M Ford Tipper. Both models share the same kind of tipping mechanism.

    This type of mech­a­nism was already used by Mec­ca­no Bobigny on the 25M Stude­bak­er and Ford Benne Bas­cu­lante mod­els from 1949 onwards, but the French mod­el is much small­er and more frag­ile. The French 25M Ford Tip­per, for exam­ple, weighs 90 grams while the 965 Euclid clocks in at a hefty 291 grams. The dif­fer­ence between the two is evi­dent in the pic­tures that accom­pa­ny this arti­cle. The robust Euclid is a very pop­u­lar mod­el that con­tin­ues to be wide­ly avail­able.

    The pinion and ratchet mechanism of a stripped Euclid.
    L: The first Euclid version. R: The last Terex version.
    Image: Kevin (DTCA 965 forum via planetdiecast.com)

    French Dinky Toys 25M Ford Tipper with side handle with pinion and ratchet for tipping action. Image: eBay

    The 965 Euclid Rear Dump Truck prototype

    Brochure on the Euclid Rear Dump Truck 15 ton model FD.
    Image: eBay

    On eBay I came across a brochure of a 15-ton Euclid Rear Dump Truck (type FD) that bears a strong resem­blance to the Dinky 965. The dates 1953 and 1954 with a ques­tion mark are typed on the last page of the brochure. It seems this could be the pro­to­type for the Dinky 965. The assem­bly draw­ing Job No. 13970 is dat­ed 12–10-53. This mod­el has the cor­rect height of the head­lights and pro­tec­tive head­light cov­ers, the cor­rect design and posi­tion of the exhaust (includ­ing the low­er ring around the exhaust pipe), the three ribs on the top of the bed, and a two-step entry. The DTCA forums include a pho­to­graph of a 1951 Euclid R‑15 mod­el B5FD with a three-step entry.

    Shown above is a cir­ca 1952 ad from the British com­pa­ny Black­wood Hodge with images of the Euclid Rear Dump Truck in green. Black­wood Hodge was the British dis­trib­u­tor for Euclid and was con­tact­ed by Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool who were seek­ing infor­ma­tion need­ed for repro­duc­ing the Euclid mod­el.

    The 1951 Euclid R‑15 that was used as a prototype for the Dinky 965, as discussed in the DTCA 965 forums. Note the three-step entry.
    Image: Bruce Hoy (DTCA 965 forum)

    The Euclid and Terex mod­els are exten­sive­ly dis­cussed in the DTCA 965 forums, and the changes and cast­ing vari­a­tions are illus­trat­ed there. I have per­son­al­ly exam­ined all the mod­els described in my arti­cle, but a lot of sup­port­ing infor­ma­tion in my arti­cle comes from the DTCA 965 forums, espe­cial­ly from mem­ber Bruce Hoy. The var­i­ous changes to the mod­el are not­ed on Mec­ca­no draw­ings Job 13970, 13971, and 13972. The most impor­tant changes are:

    • 19–1‑1955
      “Dinky Toys” is changed to “Dinky Super­toys”.
    • 14-10-1955
      The col­or of the Euclid logo is changed from black to red.
    • 3-11-1955
      Lon­gi­tu­di­nal rein­force­ment of tip­per body catch­ment and guide.
    • 13–1‑1960
      Addi­tion of win­dows.
    • 1962
      Three ribs rein­force the bot­tom of the tip­per body above the cab.
    • 23–5‑1963
      The front wheels are reversed.
    • 26–1‑1967
      Addi­tion of two pro­tru­sions (stops) at the end of the tilt rod’s rotating/sliding move­ment.
    • 3–1‑1969
      Name changed from Euclid to Terex.

    Accord­ing com­ments in the DTCA 965 forum it should be not­ed that for tech­ni­cal pro­duc­tion rea­sons, the cab win­dows of Mod­el 965 were man­u­fac­tured by Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool at a slight angle, rather than straight as in the orig­i­nal pro­to­type. Prob­a­bly for aes­thet­ic rea­sons the sides of the model’s dump truck have three ver­ti­cal beams instead of the prototype’s four. The addi­tion of Stone-Ore-Earth trans­fers to the dump truck sides was a Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool inven­tion. They are not found on any real Euclid Rear Dump Truck. Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool ini­tial­ly intend­ed to use Stone-Sand-Grav­el trans­fers but accord­ing to Mec­ca­no draw­ing Job No. 13970 on 28–3‑55, they changed this to Stone-Ore-Earth. I per­son­al­ly researched eight mod­els, and will show details of the 6 ver­sions list­ed above with descrip­tions in chrono­log­i­cal order. How­ev­er, be aware that more ver­sions exist.


    The different boxes

    L: The Dinky 965 1st issue Euclid (sans windows) with a black Euclid logo on its type 1 blue and white striped Dinky Supertoys box with upright lettering, and reddish contour lines on the model depicted on the box.

    R: The Dinky 965 type 1 Euclid box with Quality Control Stamp “O O 955” which implies the box was inspected in September 1955. “O O” are the inspector’s initials. Meccano Liverpool was therefore already releasing the model before it was announced in the October 1955 issue of Meccano Magazine. Note the two-step entry of the Euclid.

    Shown above is the sec­ond issue Euclid Rear Dump Truck (also sans win­dows) with the red Euclid logo that was intro­duced on 14th Octo­ber 1955, and the yel­low USA export label vis­i­ble on the box. The type 2 box has upright let­ter­ing and black con­tour lines on the depict­ed mod­el.

    The stamp in the box reads “11 AN 55” which indi­cates it was issued in Novem­ber 1955. The type 1 box shown ear­li­er is stamped in Sep­tem­ber 1955 which implies the the first ver­sion with the black Euclid logo was only pro­duced for a few months.

    Although the above mod­el and box aren’t a cor­rect com­bi­na­tion, they are shown togeth­er to high­light the rar­i­ty and the unique­ness of each. The mod­el lacks the Euclid logo and “STONE-ORE-EARTH” text. I con­sid­er this to be a fac­to­ry error because there are very few exam­ples of Euclid mod­els that lack trans­fers. The type 3 box with ital­ic text has a rare green col­or dot on the end of the box. This seems to imply that Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool planned to release the mod­el in green to match the col­or of the pro­to­type. Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool also received green paint from Black­wood Hodge, but it’s unknown how it was used.

    Shown above is the Euclid with a lat­er Dinky Super­toys pic­ture lid box with ital­ic text and a hoist scene. This was the first occur­rence of a red Euclid logo on the mod­el on the box. This type of box which was issued around 1963–64 is the first type to sport a lid after the blue and white striped Dinky Super­toys lid box­es. This was dur­ing the end of the Dinky Super­toys peri­od, when Lines Bros took over Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool in 1964, end­ing the Dinky Super­toys run.

    This pic­ture shows the 965 Terex with the Terex GM logo on a “DINKY TOYS” Euclid pic­ture box. It is strik­ing that 965 now received a “DINKY TOYS” box for the first time, instead of a Dinky Super­toys box. The name Dinky Super­toys dis­ap­peared with the takeover of Lines Bros in 1964. Lines Bros only reg­is­tered the DINKY name, with the addi­tion of “TOYS” prob­a­bly added for mar­ket­ing pur­pos­es. Note the absence of the turn­ing han­dle on the mod­el’s illus­tra­tion on this rare issue box. Although the “Terex” name adorns the radi­a­tor, the base con­tin­ues to indi­cate “Euclid”.

    Shown here is the Dinky 965 Terex with the Terex GM logo, in its new­ly released DINKY TOYS Terex pic­ture box and the Terex name on the radi­a­tor and the base. A curi­ous note appears on the box: “Col­or of mod­el may dif­fer from illus­tra­tion.” Accord­ing to Bruce Hoy’s com­ment in the DTCA 965 forum, this note can be explained by the fact that under cer­tain light­ing con­di­tions, the mod­el has a hint of green. The yel­low col­or clear­ly dif­fers from the first edi­tion Euclid.


    The different castings

    This image is of a first issue Dinky 965 with a black Euclid logo. The mod­el lacks the rein­force­ment between the lugs along the sides of the ratch­et, as well as the ratch­et stop and the under­side of the load­ing plat­form above the cab is smooth. This mod­el was pro­duced with­out win­dows until 13 Jan­u­ary 1960 and has a sleeve on the turn­ing han­dle and heavy duty black tread­ed tires. This first ver­sion with the black Euclid logo is very scarce, because short­ly after its release the black Euclid logo was replaced by a red one on 14 Octo­ber 1955.

    This image shows the sec­ond ver­sion of the Dinky 965 that sport­ed a red Euclid logo since 14 Octo­ber 1955. This is the USA export mod­el that was issued in Novem­ber 1955 and has the same char­ac­ter­is­tics as the first ver­sion in the pre­vi­ous image.

    This third vari­a­tion of the Euclid has a red Euclid logo and reversed front wheels with a V groove and was pro­duced with win­dows since 13 Jan­u­ary 1960 and pack­aged in a lat­er Dinky Super­toys pic­ture box as shown above. The mod­el has rein­forced sides between the cams along the ratch­et, with three ribs rein­forc­ing the bot­tom of the load­ing plat­form above the cab. How­ev­er, it con­tin­ues to lack a ratch­et stop and a sleeve on the turn­ing han­dle.

    Here’s a fac­to­ry error Dinky 965 Euclid with­out the Euclid logo and the leg­end “STONE-ORE-EARTH”, now with two cams at the end of the ratch­et stop which were intro­duced on 26 Jan­u­ary 1967. It has the same char­ac­ter­is­tics as the third ver­sion above, but the front wheels which should have been reversed from 23 May 1963 are still con­vex.

    Although sim­i­lar to the ear­li­er mod­el, this Dinky 965 Terex Rear Dump Truck with the Terex GM logo but a Euclid DINKY TOYS pic­ture box is a rar­i­ty because it has the “Terex” name on the radi­a­tor but “Euclid” on the base.

    Image: Bruce Hoy, DTCA

    The image above is of a very rare Dinky 965 Terex with the Terex name on the radi­a­tor but the Euclid name on the base. Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool first exhaust­ed its stock of Euclid named bases before switch­ing to those with the Terex name. This mod­el has anoth­er type of grooved tires.

    This vari­a­tion of the Dinky 965 Terex Rear Dump Truck has the “Terex” name on the radi­a­tor as well as the base, and the Terex mod­el depict­ed on its DINKY TOYS Terex box.

    The image above is of a Dinky 965 Terex with the Terex name on the radi­a­tor and the plinth in place of the for­mer Euclid name on the base. This mod­el also has a dif­fer­ent type of grooved tires.

    Here’s a pair of Euclid mod­els with the red Euclid logo and win­dows. The mod­el on the left has front wheels that were reversed from 23 May 1963, and no sleeve on the crank han­dle. The mod­el on the right has the orig­i­nal con­vex wheels and a sleeve on the crank han­dle.

    Here’s a com­par­i­son of the first type of the 1955 Dinky 965 Euclid Rear Dump Truck with the last type Dinky 965 Terex Rear Dump Truck which was issued in 1970. Note the dif­fer­ence in the ring around the bot­tom of the exhaust pipe. Under cer­tain light­ing con­di­tions, the Terex mod­el has a hint of green and its shade of yel­low dif­fers from the first edi­tion Euclid.

    L: The rear of the first version 965 without the two lugs for the ratchet stop.
    R: The rear of the fourth version of the 965 showing the two lugs for the ratchet stop.

    This first ver­sion Euclid lacks win­dows and has a smooth inte­ri­or roof with one ejec­tion mark­ing in the cen­ter. Note the black Euclid logo fac­ing the rear as also is pic­tured on the Euclid brochure. The right side of the mod­el shows the Euclid logo fac­ing for­ward as is the case on the real vehi­cle.

    The third ver­sion of the Euclid has a cross hatched inte­ri­or cab roof and one ejec­tor mark­ing, and a plas­tic win­dow in the cen­ter with the EUCLID name below it. Note the red for­ward fac­ing Euclid logo. The right side of the mod­el also shows the Euclid logo fac­ing for­ward, but the restored Euclid R‑15 green pro­to­type inn the DTCA forum shows the red Euclid logo on the right fac­ing the rear.

    This fifth ver­sion of the Dinky 965 shows the Terex GM logo on the doors. The inside cab­in roof is smooth and the mod­el has a sin­gle ejec­tion mark­ing fas­ten­ing point. In the cen­ter of the plas­tic win­dow is the name “EUCLID”.

    Shown above is the base of the first issue Dinky 965 with the Euclid name and a sleeve on the crank. Note the absence of rein­force­ment along the sides of the ratch­et. The tires are heavy duty tires with block tread, and Dinky Super­toys adorns the raised plinth. Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool ini­tial­ly clas­si­fied the 965 as Dinky Toys and applied the name Dinky Toys to the mold. How­ev­er, dur­ing the the renum­ber­ing phase, Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool reclas­si­fied it as Dinky Super­toys in Mec­ca­no Mag­a­zine of March 1955. On 19 Jan­u­ary 1955, the mold was changed to reflect Dinky Super­toys on the plinth. I described this remark­able reclas­si­fi­ca­tion in the April 2024 issue of the DTCA Jour­nal.

    The first ver­sion Dinky 965 Euclid mod­els in the blue striped Dinky Super­toys box­es and pic­ture box­es with a lid were issued with card­board inner pack­ag­ing over the han­dle of the truck to pre­vent dam­age to the box dur­ing trans­port. Note the red con­tour lines of the mod­el on the box, mak­ing its edges more vis­i­ble.

    This is the sixth ver­sion of the Dinky 965 Terex Rear Dump Truck in its orig­i­nal “DINKY TOYS” card­board end flap box with inner card­board pack­ag­ing to pre­vent dam­age dur­ing trans­port.  This mod­el has raised rein­force­ment along both sides of the ratch­et and the round slid­ing plate. Due to the rein­force­ment on both sides of the base, the raised plinth with the Dinky Super­toys logo was delet­ed and the Dinky Super­toys name cast on the flat base. This mod­el used a dif­fer­ent type of grooved tires and lacked a sleeve on the turn­ing crank.

    Shown above is the first ver­sion Dinky 965 Euclid with a black Euclid logo and trans­fers. Note the block tread tires and the twelve wheel bolts which are also present on the real vehi­cle. This mod­el has no rein­force­ment between the lugs on the base.

    Here is the Dinky 965 with a red Euclid logo and V‑grooved tires embossed with the “M” iden­ti­fi­er. The rein­force­ment between the lugs of the base is vis­i­ble and the “STONE ORE EARTH” text is notice­ably green com­pared to the black let­ter­ing of the first edi­tion mod­el.

    This is the Dinky 965 Terex with the Terex logo on the doors, no trans­fers on the load­ing bed and a dif­fer­ent type of grooved tires. The twelve wheel bolts which are also present on the real vehi­cle are vis­i­ble, as is the the rein­force­ment between the lugs of the base.

    L: Dinky 965 with convex wheels.
    R: Dinky 964 with concave wheels.

    The white “Test­ed by” con­trol labels were usu­al­ly includ­ed with mod­els with a rotat­ing mech­a­nism and indi­cat­ed the mech­a­nism had been test­ed for prop­er oper­a­tion. These labels are often lost.

    The Dinky 965 was issued with three types of tires: heavy duty block tread, V‑groove and anoth­er type of grooved tires. Note the raised rein­force­ment on either side of the ratch­et on the base of the sec­ond and third mod­els. The dif­fer­ence in cast­ing of the raised plinth with the Dinky Super­toys name on the first mod­el and the Dinky Super­toys name with­out the raised plinth on the sec­ond and third mod­els is also clear­ly vis­i­ble.


    The sad end of the Terex Euclid version

    As men­tioned ear­li­er, dur­ing the pro­duc­tion years 1955 to 1970 there were many very inter­est­ing cast­ing vari­a­tions that were dis­cussed and depict­ed in detail in the DTCA 965 forum. The most impor­tant vari­a­tion took place on Jan­u­ary 3, 1969, men­tioned under item 12 of the Mec­ca­no draw­ing Job No. 13971, when the name EUCLID was changed to TEREX. How­ev­er, as we know, the new Terex mod­el was only pro­duced for a short time before it was unex­pect­ed­ly dis­con­tin­ued. What could be the rea­son for that?

    There’s an inter­est­ing and detailed sto­ry relat­ed to its ter­mi­na­tion that has been described by Bruce Hoy in the 965 Terex DTCA forum top­ic. In short, it comes down to this: Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool thought it was just a reor­ga­ni­za­tion of the name Euclid to Terex and changed the name Euclid on the mod­el 965 to Terex. They thought that this would allow them to con­tin­ue pro­duc­ing and sell­ing the mod­el 965 as a Terex mod­el. How­ev­er, the own­er Gen­er­al Motors, who changed the name of the earth­mov­ing equip­ment divi­sion from Euclid to Terex, used a com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent mod­el Rear Dump Truck, the more mod­ern Terex mod­el R‑17, shown in the forum, instead of Euclid R‑15. A legal process threat­ened to arise and Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool abrupt­ly stopped fur­ther pro­duc­tion of the Terex Dinky 965 to avoid legal prob­lems.

    The new mod­el 965 Terex were issued for a short time with the Terex name on the base and Terex GM logo on the doors, as well as with its new 965 Terex DINKY toys box. How­ev­er, the adver­tise­ment in the UK 1969 No. 5 cat­a­log was notable. The 965 appeared as Euclid Rear Dump Truck depict­ed in UK cat­a­log No. 5 of May 1969 up to and includ­ing its 3rd print­ing of 1st Jan­u­ary 1970, but the 965 on the catalog’s price list referred to the Terex Rear Dump Truck with a price of 14/11. The Dinky 965 Terex with the Terex box is very scarce due to its short pro­duc­tion run of less than a year. It’s a pity that pro­duc­tion of the Terex mod­el end­ed abrupt­ly. It was a very pop­u­lar — and for Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool — a very prof­itable mod­el and could have last­ed for years to come. The pro­duc­tion of the new Terex mod­el and its orig­i­nal Terex box is proof that Mec­ca­no Liv­er­pool intend­ed to con­tin­ue pro­duc­ing this mod­el for sev­er­al years. This is the back­ground sto­ry about the remark­able end of mod­el 965 Terex, inter­est­ing enough to pub­lish here again.

    This is the last Dinky Toys cat­a­log (UK No. 5, 1969) show­ing the Dinky 965 as a Euclid Rear Dump Truck instead of a Terex Rear Dump Truck.

    The price list accom­pa­ny­ing the Dinky Toys UK cat­a­log No. 5 (1st to 3rd print­ing) of 1 Jan­u­ary 1970 show­ing the 965 named as Terex Rear Dump Truck with a price of 14/11.


    Rare 965 versions

    Red (and some­times mil­i­tary green) hubs can be found on both the Euclid and Terex mod­els. This occurred when insuf­fi­cient yel­low hubs had been pro­duced but there was a sur­plus of red hubs intend­ed for the 437 Muir-Hill 2WL Loader or the 959 Foden Dump Truck with Bull­doz­er, and sur­plus green hubs orig­i­nal intend­ed for the 666 Mis­sile Erec­tor Vehi­cle with Cor­po­ral Mis­sile. These vari­a­tions were more fre­quent dur­ing the final years of pro­duc­tion, and pri­mar­i­ly in the last two types of box­es, per Bruce Hoy’s com­ment in the DTCA 965 forum.

    Rare Dinky Toys 965 Terex Rear Dump Truck with red hubs.
    Image: Vectis Auctions

    Rare Dinky Toys 965 Euclid Rear Dump Truck with dark green hubs.
    Image: Vectis Auctions

    Rare chrome plated promotional issue of the 965 Dinky Euclid Rear Dump Truck.
    Image: Vectis Auctions

    My Dinky 965 Euclid and Terex Rear Dump collection with their original boxes.

    My 5 main versions of the Dinky 965 including a factory error in the center.

  • Catalog 1941 USA

    Catalog 1941 USA

    Catalog courtesy Jan Werner.
    This was a gift from a U.S. collector and is believed to be the only one of its kind in existence.

  • Catalog 1950 USA

    Catalog 1950 USA

  • Lady Penelope’s FAB1 with Chauffeur Parker

    Lady Penelope’s FAB1 with Chauffeur Parker

    Dinky Toys No. 100 is a true gem for any col­lec­tor and fan of clas­sic tele­vi­sion. This beau­ti­ful­ly detailed minia­ture of the leg­endary FAB1, known from the pop­u­lar British super­mar­i­on­a­tion series Thun­der­birds, is far more than just a toy car — it’s a piece of nos­tal­gia, engi­neer­ing, and pop cul­ture all in one.

    The FAB1 is the icon­ic pink vehi­cle of Lady Pene­lope Creighton-Ward, the ele­gant and fear­less secret agent who, along with her ever-loy­al and prop­er chauf­feur Park­er, is part of the Inter­na­tion­al Res­cue team. The Thun­der­birds series cap­ti­vat­ed audi­ences in the 1960s with its futur­is­tic vehi­cles, thrilling mis­sions, and unique pup­pet ani­ma­tion. This Dinky Toys mod­el brings that mag­i­cal era back to life.

    Based on a lux­u­ri­ous Rolls-Royce and equipped with six wheels, the FAB1 fea­tures a jet engine capa­ble of pro­pelling the vehi­cle to an impres­sive 320 km/h (200 mph) on land, and near­ly 100 km/h (60 mph) over water. But speed isn’t its only asset — the FAB1 is packed with high-tech gad­gets that help Lady Pene­lope stay one step ahead of her ene­mies.

    This Dinky FAB1 includes work­ing fea­tures such as a har­poon, four launch­ing rock­ets, and con­cealed laser machine guns. The vehi­cle is also equipped with bul­let­proof glass and var­i­ous oth­er defen­sive sys­tems. just like in the thrilling episodes of the series. The minia­ture described in this arti­cle has been care­ful­ly restored and accom­pa­nied by a stun­ning repro­duc­tion of the orig­i­nal dio­ra­ma dis­play box, giv­ing it an even more authen­tic look.

    This time, I restored two FABs simul­ta­ne­ous­ly. For a small batch, this approach is sur­pris­ing­ly effi­cient; the total lead time is only about one and a half times longer than restor­ing a sin­gle mod­el. By com­bin­ing the tasks, from prepa­ra­tion and clean­ing to paint­ing, pol­ish­ing, and trim­ming new parts, it’s pos­si­ble to strike a great bal­ance between qual­i­ty and effi­cien­cy.

    Thun­der­birds are go!

  • An Interview With Vic Mumby

    An Interview With Vic Mumby

    It’s very rare for a for­mer Mec­ca­no employ­ee to be involved with the col­lect­ing com­mu­ni­ty. How­ev­er, Vic Mum­by, ex-chief draughts­man for Mec­ca­no Ltd., is active in the Horn­by Rail­way Col­lec­tors Asso­ci­a­tion (HRCA) and Dinky Toy Col­lec­tors Asso­ci­a­tion (DTCA). This inter­view was con­duct­ed short­ly after he first joined the DTCA.

    Vic Mumby with his favorite Dinky design, the 102 Joe’s Car
    Image courtesy Vic Mumby


    Wel­come, Vic! As you know, the late Doug McHard (Mec­ca­no mar­ket­ing man­ag­er) start­ed his own firm (Somerville) cater­ing to mod­el car col­lec­tors. Do you know any oth­er Mec­ca­no alum­ni who are engaged with the col­lect­ing com­mu­ni­ty?

    I’m afraid not. I believe that giv­en my recent involve­ment with the DTCA — plus the HRCA since 2015 — any oth­er ex-Mec­ca­no employ­ees would have made them­selves known. My elder broth­er is a past employ­ee of Mec­ca­no, and I exchange Christ­mas cards with a cou­ple of oth­ers who are not DTCA mem­bers. Sad­ly, sev­er­al oth­er col­leagues have passed away in recent years.


    You joined Mec­ca­no in 1961. What led to the choice of work­ing for this par­tic­u­lar com­pa­ny? And had you any Dinky Toys, Mec­ca­no, or Horn­by trains as a boy?

    After achiev­ing very good grades in GCE exams in 1961 (aged 16), I felt I want­ed to get a job and earn some mon­ey, despite my teach­ers rec­om­mend­ing I should go onto col­lege. After I had applied for sev­er­al engi­neer­ing jobs, most of which meant long com­mutes, my father sug­gest­ed that my broth­er Jim could see if he could get me employ­ment with Mec­ca­no Ltd.

    In Sep­tem­ber 1961 I was tak­en on as an appren­tice tool­mak­er at the Han­son Road fac­to­ry. The wages weren’t great ini­tial­ly, but I received one day a week release to fur­ther my edu­ca­tion.

    I have no regrets about going to Mec­ca­no. The knowl­edge gained dur­ing the 18 years from 1961–1979 (which includ­ed a one-year break) with them proved invalu­able dur­ing the remain­der of my work­ing career, all the way up to retire­ment in 2009.

    From the age of about 3 or 4, I was giv­en and then col­lect­ed Dinky Toys, Mec­ca­no, and final­ly Horn­by Dublo. Thanks to Jim’s employ­ment with Mec­ca­no Ltd as a tool­mak­er, he was able to make staff pur­chas­es which reduced the cost by 33%.

    I sold off my com­plete set of Army vehi­cles, some com­mer­cials, and mod­ern air­craft dur­ing 2012–13. Pri­or to this I gave all ear­li­er toys away to nephews, or they became play worn. The only Dinkys I now pos­sess are those I designed.

    After start­ing work I lost inter­est in my 3‑Rail Horn­by Dublo, which found a good home with a friend of my father. Since retir­ing in 2009 my inter­est in 2‑Rail Horn­by Dublo has been rekin­dled.


    Your career began when Mec­ca­no Ltd. was still in Horn­by’s hands, con­tin­ued when Lines Broth­ers pur­chased it, and end­ed when Air­fix were in con­trol. Did you ever meet Roland Horn­by? Did the changes in own­er­ship cause any upheavals?

    I don’t recall meet­ing Roland Horn­by face to face. Changes of own­er­ship only affect­ed senior man­age­ment, with some reshuf­fling of mid­dle man­age­ment. There was very lit­tle effect on design and man­u­fac­tur­ing apart from stream­lin­ing process­es.


    An inescapable fact is that indus­tri­al unrest plagued Binns Road. Depend­ing on who’s writ­ing the his­to­ry, this was either the result of poor man­age­ment and work­ers being forced to use anti­quat­ed meth­ods — or restric­tive union prac­tices and refusal to use new equip­ment. Are there any thoughts you can share on this today?

    I believe — and this is my per­son­al opin­ion — that most labur issues were due to man­age­ment not engag­ing ful­ly with staff and unions to dis­cuss the pros and cons of pro­posed changes. I left the draw­ing office for twelve months in 1973, along with sev­er­al oth­er key draughts­men, due to a union “work to rule” try­ing to pur­sue a change in work­ing con­di­tions (I can’t remem­ber exact­ly what); that was nev­er going to hap­pen.

    Over the years Mec­ca­no had “too many eggs in the bas­ket” con­sum­ing rev­enue and resources. For exam­ple, they:

    1. Bought out the Plimp­ton Engi­neer­ing Co., man­u­fac­tur­ers of Bayko, spent mon­ey on new tool­ing, and re-intro­duced it as a Mec­ca­no prod­uct.
    2. Bought the rights and all tool­ing from Jones Sewing Machine Co. to man­u­fac­ture their chil­dren’s sewing machine. It was a very dif­fi­cult prod­uct to man­u­fac­ture con­sis­tent­ly.
    3. Badge-engi­neered Cir­cuit 24, a slot car rac­ing game to com­bat Scalex­tric. Man­u­fac­tured in France, it turned out to be unre­li­able.
    4. Man­u­fac­tured Play-Doh under license. Why?
    5. Released Puz­zle Mak­er, a cut­ting tool to chop up an exist­ing pic­ture into a jig­saw. Not pop­u­lar with the pub­lic, with poor sales.
    6. Cre­at­ed Pri­ma Mec­ca­no, a slot-togeth­er con­struc­tion toy aimed at the gen­er­a­tion below that who would play with the Plas­tic Mec­ca­no Range. Beau­ti­ful mold­ings, but I think tricky for tiny hands to engage the slots.
    7. Sold Astro Lite, a large spin­ning wheel with flash­ing lights and whis­tle sound. The wheel was spun by pulling the looped cord pass­ing through the cen­ter with both hands. Mere­ly a mod­ern twist on a very tra­di­tion­al toy that kids made using an old but­ton and thread.
    8. Cre­at­ed MOGUL steel toys to com­bat the Ton­ka mar­ket. Now these were beau­ti­ful, stur­dy, and well fin­ished prod­ucts with 6mm diam­e­ter axles. Sev­er­al of the range could be inte­grat­ed with met­al Mec­ca­no. Inter­est­ing­ly, you don’t often see these at Toy Fairs or Auc­tions. I guess own­ers are hang­ing onto them in the hope they will even­tu­al­ly be sought-after and valu­able.

    Final­ly, the Mini-Dinky diecast tool­ing was not up to Mec­ca­no stan­dard. Many need­ed rec­ti­fy­ing, tak­ing up valu­able tool­room resources.

    I think Mec­ca­no should have moth­balled the 2‑Rail Horn­by Dublo until the slot rac­ing craze died down and trains became pop­u­lar again. They should have stuck to what they were real­ly good at, diecast mod­els and Mec­ca­no con­struc­tion sets, espe­cial­ly the theme sets. But I guess Lines Broth­ers and Air­fix dic­tat­ed the prod­uct pro­gram.


    Lines Broth­ers designed the Spot-On-style Amer­i­can cars that Dinky man­u­fac­tured in Hong Kong and the Mini-Dinky range. Apart from these, were there any oth­er Dinkys that were not designed by Mec­ca­no?

    Yes, the 1/32 “Bat­tle Lines” VW KDF, PAK gun, US Army Jeep, and 105mm mobile gun were all foist onto Mec­ca­no by Lines Broth­ers. Lat­er, there was the DT 180 Rover 3500, the DT 219 Jaguar XJC “Big Cat”, and the DT 113 Steed’s Jaguar (from the TV series “The New Avengers”, the same cast­ing as the Big Cat but not offi­cial­ly released due to the fac­to­ry clo­sure).

    Dinky 113 Steed’s Jaguar Coupe Resin Prototype
    Image: Jon Angel

    For the Rover 3500 and Jaguar XJC mod­els, Mec­ca­no dealt with a very good con­tract mod­el-mak­ing out­fit who were very good at pro­duc­ing pro­to­types in some sort of resin. If my mem­o­ry serves me cor­rect­ly, Mec­ca­no then drew up the final toy spec­i­fi­ca­tion which went off to Hong Kong with the pro­to­types. In the Design Office, we always thought the final diecast Rover was not quite right, being some­how nar­row­er than it should have been.

    After the fac­to­ry closed, Air­fix also released a lot of oth­er small­er Dinkys, clear­ly not designed at Binns Road.


    The last two Dinkys based on Ger­ry Ander­son designs had to be revamped after the Inves­ti­ga­tor TV series failed to sell. Are there oth­er Dinkys that had to be mod­i­fied at the 11th hour — or can­celled entire­ly?

    The most notable 11th hour can­cel­la­tion was the Boe­ing 2707 SST (with swing wings), Amer­i­ca’s answer to Con­corde. The Dinky was designed by me and tools were 50% com­plet­ed, but then Boe­ing aban­doned the project and Mec­ca­no fol­lowed suit. A shame real­ly, as Mec­ca­no could have mar­ket­ed it as a “Super­son­ic Air­craft of the Future”. Maybe Boe­ing for­bade that option. Any­way, Mec­ca­no donat­ed me the mod­el pro­to­type, long since sold off.

    Anoth­er 11th hour mod­i­fi­ca­tion was to DT 102 Joe’s Car, where Joe Fall­man (Man­ag­ing Direc­tor) insist­ed on a flash­ing light in the engine exhaust cowl. So, I had to shoe-horn a bulb hold­er, switch and AAA bat­tery com­part­ment into an already-com­plex body with its swing wings, extend­ing tail fins and sus­pen­sion.

    Final­ly, in 1974 there was a mod­el that got no fur­ther than the draw­ing board, a 1/25 scale Jaguar XJ6 – deemed too expen­sive to tool up.


    Mat­tel (Dinky trade­mark own­ers) has allowed many Dinky Toys to be copied using 3‑D scan­ners and man­u­fac­tured in Chi­na. Among them there’s even a “clone” of your love­ly Aston-Mar­tin DB5 design. Of course there is no involve­ment with, or cred­it giv­en, to the orig­i­nal design­ers. What do you think of these copies?

    These repro­duc­tions by Mat­tel and oth­ers are beau­ti­ful mod­els but are too “per­fect”. The mask spray­ing of grilles and oth­er col­or effects is crys­tal-sharp. Orig­i­nal Dinkys often have a fuzzy bor­der.


    You’ve revealed that the reg­is­tra­tion num­bers on Dinky Toys often includ­ed the ini­tials of Draw­ing Office staff. Please tell us the names behind these com­mon­ly found pre­fix­es: FTR, INJ, MTB, and UVR. (But why was­n’t VPM used as well?)

    FTR (Fred T Risk), MTB (M Ter­ry Boland), UVR (U Ver­non Rogers). Sor­ry I can’t place INJ. I’ve no idea why VPM wasn’t; pos­si­bly there was too much stock of pre­vi­ous names and I was the last to be includ­ed. Maybe I’m out there some­where?


    You left Mec­ca­no just months before the fac­to­ry closed. Why?

    I left Mec­ca­no in April 1979 after being offered a job as an Injec­tion Mold design­er for a grow­ing mold-mak­ing com­pa­ny in Liv­er­pool. Anoth­er rea­son for my leav­ing then was the despon­dent atmos­phere that seemed to have gripped the whole fac­to­ry. When I hand­ed in my res­ig­na­tion, I remarked to my then boss, Tech­ni­cal Man­ag­er Trevor Douce, that there weren’t enough peo­ple work­ing hard enough. He agreed.


    Have you ever heard what hap­pened to the tool­ing for Dinkys after the fac­to­ry closed?

    The fate of the tool­ing for the Dinkys is a com­plete mys­tery, espe­cial­ly for those pro­duced from 1965 — 1979. Ear­li­er tool­ing (pre-WW2) would have been scrapped to make room in the tool stores. How­ev­er, there were sev­er­al thou­sand diecast and plas­tic injec­tion molds on the shelves when the fac­to­ry closed.

    I think the tool­ing for Mec­ca­no sets would have been tak­en up by Mec­ca­no France — although this is just a guess on my part.


    Of all the Dinky Toys that you designed, do you have a favorite?

    Yes, undoubt­ed­ly the DT 102 Joe’s Car!

    I some­times get annoyed at the unfound­ed crit­i­cism aimed at the prod­ucts of Binns Road, espe­cial­ly when they are com­pared with the mod­ern high­ly detailed diecasts and trains man­u­fac­tured abroad. Dinkys and Dublo were designed to be played with and maybe get bat­tered and bruised in the process. Try drop­ping a beau­ti­ful Bach­mann or mod­ern Horn­by loco­mo­tive on a hard floor and watch the bits fly off. I won­der how many of these mod­ern offer­ings will still be usable 100 years from now!


    Vic Mum­by is DTCA mem­ber MUMBY655 and HRCA mem­ber 8801.

  • Dinky Toys Lawn Mower

    Dinky Toys Lawn Mower

    The post-war years at Mec­ca­no Ltd. deliv­ered a huge num­ber of new Dinky Toys. Dur­ing this time, the com­pa­ny mod­eled prac­ti­cal­ly any­thing and every­thing. And to me, this is part of the charm of col­lect­ing Dinky Toys, know­ing they were cre­at­ed in this long ago era and meant to reflect every­day life, not just trucks and cars rid­ing the road.

    L: Dinky 1952 (Egypt) catalog.
    R: Dinky 1957 catalog.

    In 1949, Dinky Toys made a leap and intro­duced the No. 751 Lawn Mow­er, and sur­pris­ing­ly labeled it a Super­toys. Like many young boys I noticed this in those ear­ly cat­a­logs, but in those younger years, I was keen to col­lect slight­ly more desir­able vehi­cles, caus­ing this delight­ful mod­el to stay off my col­lect­ing radar for decades. Final­ly, about fif­teen years ago, I read a glow­ing review and decid­ed it was time to find one.

    The Dinky 751 Lawn Mower introduced in the July 1949 issue of Meccano Magazine.

    Let me state right up front: this is an absolute trea­sure of a diecast mod­el. It’s com­posed of many sep­a­rate parts, all expert­ly made to a very close tol­er­ance. It’s a delight to hold, as it’s quite sol­id and has a nice heft to it. And you’re in for a nice sur­prise when you place it on a flat sur­face and move it for­ward; the revolv­ing blade assem­bly is prop­er­ly dri­ven and geared by the large roller, and you feels it might actu­al­ly cut grass!

    In 1954, the Dinky Super­toys 751 Lawn Mow­er was renum­bered to 386, and reduced to sim­ply a Dinky Toy. It was sub­se­quent­ly retired in 1958.

    Dinky 386 Lawn Mower. Image: Vectis Auctions.

    The Dinky Lawn Mover is a superb mod­el that reflects the high skill lev­el of Mec­ca­no crafts­men.

  • The Smallest Dinky Toy

    The Smallest Dinky Toy

    With a length of only 26.8 mm (1.05 in) for the trac­tor and 49 mm (1.9 in) for the trail­er, the Dublo Dinky 076 Lans­ing Bag­nall TD 200 trac­tor and trail­er is the small­est of all Dinky Toys.

    The Dinky Dublo 076 Lansing Bagnall Tractor & Trailer.
    Image: J K Diecast Models

    The 076 was intro­duced in an adver­tise­ment on the back cov­er of the June 1960 issue of Mec­ca­no Mag­a­zine and sold for 2/9, inclu­sive of tax.

    Dinky Dublo 076 Lansing Bagnall Tractor & Trailer on the back cover of Meccano Magazine, June 1960.

    The 1960 edi­tion of the Dinky Toys cat­a­log also list­ed the Dublo Dinky 078 Lans­ing Bag­nall Trail­er, which was sold sep­a­rate­ly for 1/4. The only vari­a­tion of the mod­el is in its plas­tic tires, which were ini­tial­ly smooth and lat­er tread­ed.

    The Dinky Dublo 076 Lansing Bagnall Tractor & Trailer in the Dinky Toys 1960 catalog.

    The sep­a­rate­ly avail­able trail­er was offered in a Dinky trade box of six. There must have been a large amount of unsold stock of these trade box­es, because the trail­ers were avail­able until 1966, two years after pro­duc­tion of the 076 trac­tor and trail­er mod­el was dis­con­tin­ued. The 078 trade box is also the small­est trade box made by Dinky.

    Dinky Dublo 078 Lansing Bagnall Trailer trade box.
    Image: Dave Busfield

    The Lansing Bagnall tractor at work at Basingstoke Station.

    The diesel TODR trac­tor and the trail­er were made by Lans­ing Bag­nall of Bas­ingstoke, Hamp­shire, Eng­land, whose main prod­ucts were elec­tri­cal­ly pow­ered fork lift trucks. Lans­ing Bag­nall was acquired in 1989 by Linde Mate­r­i­al Han­dling (UK) Ltd., part of the KION group of Frank­furt am Main, a world leader in the man­u­fac­ture, sup­ply and sup­port of mate­r­i­al han­dling equip­ment.

    The Lansing Bagnall tractor and trailer in the Dinky Toys Encyclopaedia.

    You can read more about the Dinky Dublo 076 Lans­ing Bag­nall Trac­tor & Trail­er in The Fab­u­lous Dinky Toys Ency­clopae­dia.